2010
DOI: 10.3855/jidc.784
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of a particle gel immunoassay for Trypanosoma cruzi antibody detection using plasma samples collected with capillary tubes

Abstract: Introduction: The Chagas disease particle gel immunoassay (PaGIA-Chagas) is a simple, fast and practical test used for the diagnosis of the chronic Chagas disease and is based on anti-Trypanosoma cruzi antibody detection in serum. This study aimed to validate the PaGIA-Chagas on plasma collected with capillary tubes. Methodology: Serum samples from 74 T. cruzi-infected and 26 non-infected individuals were tested by conventional indirect immunofluorescence and PaGIA-Chagas. Later, plasma specimens collected wit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
(9 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The currently accepted methods for the detection of Trypanosoma such as microscopic examination and xenodiagnoses have poor sensitivity and are also labor-intensive and time-consuming [ 1 , 2 ]. Immunological methods such as enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, immunochromatographic dipstick test, radioimmunosorbent assay, and immunofluorescence antibody test are rapid and sensitive but not specific [ 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 ]. Molecular methods such as PCR and real-time nucleic acid sequence-based amplification are very specific but expensive and time consuming, although combination of PCR and chemiluminescence southern blot has been used to improve the sensitivity of the detection of Trypanosoma [ 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The currently accepted methods for the detection of Trypanosoma such as microscopic examination and xenodiagnoses have poor sensitivity and are also labor-intensive and time-consuming [ 1 , 2 ]. Immunological methods such as enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, immunochromatographic dipstick test, radioimmunosorbent assay, and immunofluorescence antibody test are rapid and sensitive but not specific [ 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 ]. Molecular methods such as PCR and real-time nucleic acid sequence-based amplification are very specific but expensive and time consuming, although combination of PCR and chemiluminescence southern blot has been used to improve the sensitivity of the detection of Trypanosoma [ 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%