2021
DOI: 10.15331/jdsm.7190
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of a Novel Trial Oral Appliance Protocol Versus a Conventional Custom Oral Appliance Protocol for the Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another approach that uses a combination of tongue size and sex to select phenotypical features that achieve treatment outcomes superior to the conventional fitting of custom oral appliances is available but warrants careful implementation and evaluation in new settings (ApneaGuard). The ApneaGuard trial device (Advanced Brain Monitoring, Carlsbad CA) was developed to predict both efficacy and optimum mandibular position, including the degree of vertical opening [ 92 ]. A better understanding of other treatment response predictors such as the identification of phenotypes that confer greater responsiveness to OAT or HNS needs to be considered.…”
Section: Multidisciplinary Care Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another approach that uses a combination of tongue size and sex to select phenotypical features that achieve treatment outcomes superior to the conventional fitting of custom oral appliances is available but warrants careful implementation and evaluation in new settings (ApneaGuard). The ApneaGuard trial device (Advanced Brain Monitoring, Carlsbad CA) was developed to predict both efficacy and optimum mandibular position, including the degree of vertical opening [ 92 ]. A better understanding of other treatment response predictors such as the identification of phenotypes that confer greater responsiveness to OAT or HNS needs to be considered.…”
Section: Multidisciplinary Care Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%