2016
DOI: 10.5812/aapm.32101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of a New “Objective Pain Score” Vs. “Numeric Rating Scale” For the Evaluation of Acute Pain: A Comparative Study

Abstract: Background:Pain scores are used for acute pain management. The assessment of pain by the patient as well as the caregiver can be influenced by a variety of factors. The numeric rating scale (NRS) is widely used due to its easy application. The NRS requires abstract thinking by a patient to assign a score to correctly reflect analgesic needs, and its interpretation is subject to bias.Objectives:The study was done to validate a 4-point objective pain score (OPS) for the evaluation of acute postoperative pain and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0
17

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
32
0
17
Order By: Relevance
“…Recovery time (defined as the time from the end of operation to spontaneous eye opening or response to verbal command) and extubation time (defined as the time from the completion of operation to extubation) was evaluated and recorded. Objective pain score (OPS) (as shown in Table 1) [22,23] was used for the evaluation of pain degree, and the PAED scale (as shown in Table 2) [2427] and CPS (as shown in Table 3) [2830] was employed to assess POED at the time points of 0, 5, 15, 30, 45, and 60 minutes after transfer into the PACU. One parent or guardian met the child on arrival in the recovery area and the child was allowed to regain consciousness undisturbed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recovery time (defined as the time from the end of operation to spontaneous eye opening or response to verbal command) and extubation time (defined as the time from the completion of operation to extubation) was evaluated and recorded. Objective pain score (OPS) (as shown in Table 1) [22,23] was used for the evaluation of pain degree, and the PAED scale (as shown in Table 2) [2427] and CPS (as shown in Table 3) [2830] was employed to assess POED at the time points of 0, 5, 15, 30, 45, and 60 minutes after transfer into the PACU. One parent or guardian met the child on arrival in the recovery area and the child was allowed to regain consciousness undisturbed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Objective pain score is a good tool for assessment of postoperative pain and need for analgesia. 9 Clonidine and dexmedetomidine belong to α-2 agonist group. But dexmedetomidine is a highly selective α-2a agonist, having 1600 times more affinity for α-2a receptors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We read with interest the article by Tandon and colleagues (1), entitled “Validation of a New ‘Objective Pain Score’ Vs. ‘Numeric Rating Scale’ For the Evaluation of Acute Pain: A Comparative Study”, published in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine. Tandon et al reason that although a numeric rating scale (NRS) is widely used, it requires abstract thinking by each patient, and the interpretation of reflected pain severity can, therefore, be biased.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tandon et al conclude that OPS is a good stand-alone pain score and is better than the NRS for defining mild and moderate pain. They further suggest that OPS may even be used to supplement NRS when it is indicative of mild or moderate pain (1). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%