2000
DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.2000.279.4.h1698
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of a mouse conductance system to determine LV volume: comparison to echocardiography and crystals

Abstract: The application of left ventricular pressure-volume analysis to transgenic mice to characterize the cardiac phenotype has been problematic due to the small size of the mouse heart and the rapid heartbeat. Conductance technology has been miniaturized for the mouse and can solve this problem. However, there has been no validation of this technique. Accordingly, we performed echocardiography followed by simultaneous ultrasonic crystals, flow probe, and conductance studies in 18 CD-1 mice. Raw conductance volumes … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

4
67
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
4
67
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Right ventricular pressures in this study were similar to several prior studies (ϳ25 mmHg) (17,37,38,50,51,65) but higher than others (ϳ18 mmHg) (32,61), which may be due to the significantly slower heart rates in those studies compared with the present study. CO measured from the right ventricle in this study was similar to CO measured previously in the right ventricular by thermodilution (10) and estimated by transesophageal echocardiography (51), as well as left ventricular output measured by a variety of techniques (3,4,15,18,53). End-diastolic volumes were also similar to those measured by echocardiography (51), but much lower than that found by Rockman et al (47) using X-ray contrast microangiography.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Right ventricular pressures in this study were similar to several prior studies (ϳ25 mmHg) (17,37,38,50,51,65) but higher than others (ϳ18 mmHg) (32,61), which may be due to the significantly slower heart rates in those studies compared with the present study. CO measured from the right ventricle in this study was similar to CO measured previously in the right ventricular by thermodilution (10) and estimated by transesophageal echocardiography (51), as well as left ventricular output measured by a variety of techniques (3,4,15,18,53). End-diastolic volumes were also similar to those measured by echocardiography (51), but much lower than that found by Rockman et al (47) using X-ray contrast microangiography.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…This methodology has been extensively validated in various species, including mice, which are substantially smaller than 4-wk-old rats (17)(18)(19). However, the experience with the conductance catheter applied in young rats is limited.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A 30 A, 10 kHz current is applied between electrodes 1 and 4 to generate an intracavitary electric field and the voltage gradient between electrodes 2 and 3 is measured to determine the instantaneous electrical conductance of the blood in the LV. The volume calibration of the conductance measurements was performed in vitro as described by Yang et al (18) and parallel conductance was determined by the hypertonic saline method (16,19,20).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We concluded that it wasn't and suggested that the active energy per beat in small animals (rats) was about 1/2 to 1/3 that in man, meaning that there would be no 4-fold difference in energy flux between rat and man or 8-fold difference between mouse and man. Since the hearts of nearly all mammals work against a blood pressure of 100 mmHg and the cardiac output and weight of human, rat, and mouse hearts are well known, it is easy to calculate that the work output per beat is about 3.3 mJ/g in man and about 1.2 mJ/g in mice (14 l stroke volume assumed, see Feldman et al [117]). If the mechanical efficiency is constant and about 20%, the energy per beat of the human heart would be about 16 mJ/g, and it would be about 6 mJ/g in a mouse.…”
Section: Species Differences In Basal Metabolismmentioning
confidence: 99%