2016
DOI: 10.4103/2455-3719.190710
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of a modified Scoliosis Research Society instrument for patients with limb deformity: The limb deformity-Scoliosis Research Society (LD-SRS) score

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
46
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Starting and ending metacarpal lengths were measured from patients’ radiographs. Patients completed the Body Image Quality of Life Inventory (BIQLI) 4 and Limb Deformity Modified Scoliosis Research Society (LD-SRS) score 5 both preoperatively and at the latest follow-up.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Starting and ending metacarpal lengths were measured from patients’ radiographs. Patients completed the Body Image Quality of Life Inventory (BIQLI) 4 and Limb Deformity Modified Scoliosis Research Society (LD-SRS) score 5 both preoperatively and at the latest follow-up.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We chose the improvement limit Δ (minimal clinically important difference, MCID) as 10% (0.5 point), as the possible finding of a smaller detectable difference would not be of clinical significance. In our pretest sample-size analysis, we used a standard deviation (SD) of LDR-SRS score of 0.6 points based on previous report in the literature (18). With a significance level of 5% (two-sided confidence interval of 95%), and a power of 90%, the sample size was calculated to include at least 30 in each group.…”
Section: Outcomes and Sample Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the sample size was small given the nature of this study, we observed improvements in almost all LD-SRS and PROMIS domain scores individually. Using previously validated minimal clinically important difference values of 0.3 for LD-SRS, 4.5 for PROMIS physical function, and 4.1 for PROMIS pain interference, 9,20 we observed mean improvements that translate to clinical improvement in the quality of life of patients treated with this staged approach. In addition, despite the staged approach to correction, patients in this series reported a high level of satisfaction following the procedures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…LD-SRS is a previously validated limb modified spinal score patient-reported outcomes measure that quantifies quality of life measures for patients with lower-limb deformity, with domains assessing function, pain, self-image, mental health, and satisfaction with management. 9 The PROMIS computerized adaptive tests (CAT) used in this study have been previously validated for foot and ankle surgery 1,18,19 and included physical function, pain interference, pain intensity, global physical health, and global mental health. Scores have a standardized mean of 50, the reference population average, with a standard deviation ( T score) of 10.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation