2006
DOI: 10.2307/4151345
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of a Model of Extramusical Influences on Solo and Small-Ensemble Festival Ratings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
14
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
3
14
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Bergee and Westfall (2005) sought to develop a model that would explain the various influences on festival ratings. Bergee's (2006) final version of the model confirmed that solo performers who performed in the afternoon and who came from large, metropolitan, wellfunded schools had the highest likelihood of success.…”
Section: Research Related To the Adjudication Processsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Bergee and Westfall (2005) sought to develop a model that would explain the various influences on festival ratings. Bergee's (2006) final version of the model confirmed that solo performers who performed in the afternoon and who came from large, metropolitan, wellfunded schools had the highest likelihood of success.…”
Section: Research Related To the Adjudication Processsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…We also recommend examining a number of state music festival evaluations to determine if there is an existing relationship between evaluation scores and ensemble (or school) size of participating concert bands. While this relationship has been explored in the context of solo and small-ensemble festival ratings (e.g., Bergee, 2006; Bergee & Platt, 2003; Bergee & McWhirter, 2005; Bergee & Westfall, 2005), less research has been conducted involving large instrumental ensembles. In addition, expanding the performance context to include string orchestras, full orchestras, and jazz bands may help to add credence to existing research findings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Music education researchers investigating adjudicated events have conducted many studies assessing student and teacher attitude (Austin, 1988; Hamann, Mills, Bell, Daugherty, & Koozer, 1990; Howard, 1994; Meyers, 2011), improving the reliability of the contest ratings or rankings (Brakel, 2006; Garman, Boyle, & DeCarbo, 1991; Geringer, Allen, MacLeod, & Scott, 2009; Hash, 2012; Latimer, Bergee, & Cohen, 2010; Pope & Barnes, 2015), examining the extramusical influences on student success at adjudicated events (Bergee, 2006; Bergee & McWhirter, 2005; Bergee & Platt, 2003; Bergee & Westfall, 2005), and supporting increased music achievement as a result of participation in an adjudicated event (Austin, 1988; Hurley, 1996). Furthermore, Rohrer (2002) found that adjudicated events have the potential to advance performance standards, shape morale within a music program, increase interest, and provide both students and directors opportunities for improving ensemble quality.…”
Section: Framework From Music Education Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A variety of methodological approaches have been used by researchers to examine adjudicated events. Causal comparisons (Bergee, 2006; Bergee & McWhirter, 2005; Bergee & Platt, 2003; Bergee & Westfall, 2005; Brakel, 2006; Hash, 2012), quasi-experimental research (Austin, 1988), and survey methodology (Brunsed, Sochinski, & Hinkle, 1983; Hamann et al, 1990; Howard, 1994) are designs that have been used by researchers in music education. However, a limitation of prior research is the absence of the voice of experienced music teachers on large-group adjudicated events.…”
Section: Framework From Music Education Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%