2016
DOI: 10.17533/udea.redin.n79a13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of a methodology to determine Benzene, Toluene, Ethylbenzene, and Xylenes concentration present in the air and adsorbed in activated charcoal passive samplers by GC/FID chromatography

Abstract: ABSTRACT:This article shows the validation of the analytical procedure which allows determining concentrations of Benzene (B), Toluene (T), Ethylbenzene (E), and Xylenes (X) -compounds known as BTEX-present in the air and adsorbed by over activated charcoal by GC-FID using the (Fluorobenzene) internal standard addition as quantification method. In the process, reference activated charcoal was employed for validation and coconut -base granular charcoal (CGC) for the construction of passive captors used in sampl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(13 reference statements)
0
0
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This shows, mainly for stations measuring benzene, the low quality of the measurements available, and while this reduction may be perceived as a limitation for model evaluation, it is a critical measure to ensure the reliability of measurements. It is also crucial to recognise the potential measurement uncertainties, as exemplified by Gallego-Díez et al (2016), which can significantly vary based on the chosen methodology and instrumentation setup. The measurement methods for each station, when available, are detailed in Appendix F. 3 Results…”
Section: Air Quality Network and Observational Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This shows, mainly for stations measuring benzene, the low quality of the measurements available, and while this reduction may be perceived as a limitation for model evaluation, it is a critical measure to ensure the reliability of measurements. It is also crucial to recognise the potential measurement uncertainties, as exemplified by Gallego-Díez et al (2016), which can significantly vary based on the chosen methodology and instrumentation setup. The measurement methods for each station, when available, are detailed in Appendix F. 3 Results…”
Section: Air Quality Network and Observational Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pengukuran dilakukan sebanyak 3 kali (pagi, siang, sore) di masingmasing titik, menggunakan metode GC-FID (Gas Chromatography with Flame Ionization Detector) sesuai referensi NIOSH 1501-2003(NIOSH, 2003 (Gallego et al, 2016). Data karakteristik, perilaku pekerja, dan keluhan penyakit diperoleh melalui wawancara menggunakan kuesioner terstruktur.…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified