2020
DOI: 10.1080/10255842.2020.1810677
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of a finite element model with six-year-old child anatomical characteristics as specified in Euro NCAP Pedestrian Human Model Certification (TB024)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The study by [68] presented anonymised results for different human body models, and it was shown that certain models at their then-state did not satisfy the acceptable tolerance corridors for head impact time or body segment's centre of gravity trajectories. Since then, publications reporting improvements and compliance of various models have been published: MADYMO [3], GHBMC Simplified Pedestrian AM50 [26], TUST 6yo [78]. TB024 in its initial version provided kinematic corridors for the 50th percentile male model only.…”
Section: Euroncap Tb024mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The study by [68] presented anonymised results for different human body models, and it was shown that certain models at their then-state did not satisfy the acceptable tolerance corridors for head impact time or body segment's centre of gravity trajectories. Since then, publications reporting improvements and compliance of various models have been published: MADYMO [3], GHBMC Simplified Pedestrian AM50 [26], TUST 6yo [78]. TB024 in its initial version provided kinematic corridors for the 50th percentile male model only.…”
Section: Euroncap Tb024mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These groups include: an average female [117], so far largely underrepresented in the crash test protocols, as well as children [93] or disabled road users [163]. Modelling bodies of children [50,78,100,126,153] or the elderly pedestrians [56] remain in line with the efforts for introducing equity to the field of road safety.…”
Section: Geometry Sources Scalability Morphingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The material properties used in the 6YO child FE model were obtained from the literature (Untaroiu et al, 2005;Zhao and Norwani, 2007;Jiang et al, 2012;Lv et al, 2015;Lv WL. et al, 2016;Li et al, 2017a) and obtained by scaling adult material properties, which are summarized in Supplementary Appendix SA by Li et al (2020). It should be noted that the scaling factor was obtained based on the existing child and adult tissue material parameters.…”
Section: -Year-old Child Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model includes internal organs, skeletal tissues, muscles, ligaments, skin, and fat, as shown in Figure 2, which had been verified through the reconstruction of frontal impacts at different velocities (Ouyang et al, 2006;Ouyang et al, 2015) and lateral impact experiments at several angles (Shaw et al, 2006;Viano et al, 1989) in the literature (frontal impacts: Lv et al, 2015;Cui et al, 2016;lateral impacts: Lv et al, 2016b). Detailed information of the 6YO child FE model validation at the sub-model level is summarized in Supplementary Appendix SB by Li et al (2020).…”
Section: -Year-old Child Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%