2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0029-8018(01)00014-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of a finite difference method for the simulation of vortex-induced vibrations on a circular cylinder

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mesh 1 (p = q = 2) Mesh 2 (p = 2; q = 1) Reference CD Results referring to drag coefficient (CD) and geometric characteristics of the recirculation zone obtained behind the circular cylinder are summarized in Table 3, which are defined considering the geometric parameters presented in Figure 15. The present results are compared with numerical predictions obtained by Wanderley and Levi (2002) using a finite difference model, where a good agreement is obtained using both the basis functions proposed here, although results obtained with p = q = 2 are slightly better. It is important to notice that a mesh configuration with p = 2 and q = 1 lead to significant reductions in terms of computational efforts when compared with the processing time spent by the mesh configuration with p = q = 2, considering that full Gauss quadrature is employed here for numerical evaluation of finite element quantities, such as element matrices and vectors.…”
Section: Parametersupporting
confidence: 51%
“…Mesh 1 (p = q = 2) Mesh 2 (p = 2; q = 1) Reference CD Results referring to drag coefficient (CD) and geometric characteristics of the recirculation zone obtained behind the circular cylinder are summarized in Table 3, which are defined considering the geometric parameters presented in Figure 15. The present results are compared with numerical predictions obtained by Wanderley and Levi (2002) using a finite difference model, where a good agreement is obtained using both the basis functions proposed here, although results obtained with p = q = 2 are slightly better. It is important to notice that a mesh configuration with p = 2 and q = 1 lead to significant reductions in terms of computational efforts when compared with the processing time spent by the mesh configuration with p = q = 2, considering that full Gauss quadrature is employed here for numerical evaluation of finite element quantities, such as element matrices and vectors.…”
Section: Parametersupporting
confidence: 51%
“…The lift force, which is in the transverse direction, has the same frequency as the vortex-shedding cycle, while the frequency of the drag force, which is in the stream direction, is twice of the vortex shedding frequency (Behzad and Hamed, 2010;Wanderley et al, 2002). The drag and lift force coefficients were shown to be continuous over time in Fig.…”
Section: Numerical Parameters (Fluid Forces Acting On Cylinder)mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…[27][28][29]. The Beam-Warming central difference scheme is employed to solve the compressible NS equations in [30]. A spectral-element method [31] and second-order Monotone Advection and Reconstruction Scheme [32] were employed to solve incompressible Navier-Stokes equations.…”
Section: Application To Vortex-induced Vibration Flowsmentioning
confidence: 99%