2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.41755.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of a Clinical Prediction Rule for Severe Acute Lower Intestinal Bleeding

Abstract: We have developed and prospectively validated a clinical prediction rule for acute severe lower intestinal bleeding. This prediction rule could improve the triage of patients to appropriate levels of care and interventions, and guide a more standardized approach to acute lower intestinal bleeding.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
86
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
3
86
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Saltzman et al 18 developed AIMS65 scores for UGIB that were associated with LOS and cost. In LGIB, Strate et al 5 reported that rates of surgery, death, LOS, and transfusion were significantly higher in patients with more risk factors for severe LGIB.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Saltzman et al 18 developed AIMS65 scores for UGIB that were associated with LOS and cost. In LGIB, Strate et al 5 reported that rates of surgery, death, LOS, and transfusion were significantly higher in patients with more risk factors for severe LGIB.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on data available to the clinician at patient presentation, a model is proposed to predict outcomes for patients with LGIB [29]. Seven risk factors are identified in this model: heart rate >100, systolic blood pressure <115, syncope, nontender abdominal examination, rectal bleeding within the first 4 h of evaluation, aspirin use in the week prior to evaluation, and >2 comorbid illnesses.…”
Section: Clinical Presentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Strate et al retrospectively reviewed patients admitted for lGIB and identified seven predictors of severe bleeding: heart rate ≥ 100, systolic blood pressure ≤ 115mmHg, syncope, non-tender abdominal exam, gross rectal bleeding, aspirin use, and >2 comorbidities (Table 1) (17). patients with >3 risk factors had an 84% risk of severe bleeding defined as transfusion of >2units of red blood cells (18). Classification systems, however,d on ot predict need or possibility for surgical or angiographic intervention.…”
Section: Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%