Validation in French of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment 5-Minute, a brief cognitive screening test for phone administration

Dujardin, Kathy; Duhem, S.; Guerouaou, N.; Djelad, S.; Drumez, Élodie; Duhamel, Alain; Bombois, Stéphanie; Nasreddine, Ziad; Bordet, Régis; Deplanque, Dominique

doi:10.1016/j.neurol.2020.09.002

Cited by 11 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 16 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The Mini MoCA is a short version of the MoCA test [17] validated for telephone use [25]. The Mini MoCA consists of 4 cognitive dimensions: attention (immediate recall of 5 words), executive functions and language (1-minute verbal uency), orientation (6 items on date and geographic orientation), and memory (delayed recall and recognition of 5 previously learned words).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Long-term effects of restriction of intravenous fluid in adult ICU patients with septic shock

Kjær

Meyhoff

Sivapalan

et al. 2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose To assess long-term outcomes of restrictive versus standard intravenous (IV) fluid therapy in adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients with septic shock included in the European Conservative versus Liberal Approach to Fluid Therapy in Septic Shock in Intensive Care (CLASSIC trial). Methods We conducted the pre-planned analyses of mortality, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) using EuroQol (EQ)-5D-5L index values and EQ visual analogue scale (VAS), and cognitive function using Mini Montreal Cognitive Assessment (Mini MoCA) test at 1-year. Deceased patients were assigned numerical zero for HRQoL as a state equal to death and zero for cognitive function outcomes as worst possible score, and we used multiple imputation for missing data on HRQoL and cognitive function. Results Among 1554 randomised patients, we obtained 1-year data on mortality in 97.9% of patients, HRQoL in 91.3%, and cognitive function in 86.3%. One-year mortality was 385/746 (51.3%) in the restrictive-fluid group versus 383/767 (49.9%) in the standard-fluid group, absolute risk difference 1.5%-points (99% confidence interval (CI) -4.8 to 7.8). Mean differences were 0.00 (99% CI -0.06 to 0.05) for EQ-5D-5L index values, -0.65 for EQ VAS (-5.40 to 4.08), and − 0.14 for Mini MoCA (-1.59 to 1.14) for the restrictive-fluid group versus the standard-fluid group. The results for survivors only were similar in both groups. Conclusions Among adult ICU patients with septic shock, restrictive versus standard IV fluid therapy resulted in similar survival, HRQoL and cognitive function at one year, but clinically important differences could not be ruled out.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Long-term effects of restriction of intravenous fluid in adult ICU patients with septic shock

Kjær

Meyhoff

Sivapalan

et al. 2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Overall efficiency was assessed by the MoCA‐5 minute 7 administered 2 to 4 weeks before the other tests to limit interference. The cerebellar cognitive affective/Schmahmann syndrome (CCAS) was assessed by the dedicated scale 8 .…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Cognitive Impairment Is Part of the Phenotype of Cerebellar Ataxia, Neuropathy, Vestibular Areflexia Syndrome (CANVAS)

Dujardin,

Tard,

Diglé

et al. 2024

Movement Disorders

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundLittle is known about the impact of the cerebellar ataxia, neuropathy, vestibular areflexia syndrome (CANVAS) on cognition.ObjectiveOur objective was to determine the frequency and severity of cognitive impairment in RFC1‐positive patients and describe the pattern of deficits.MethodsParticipants underwent a comprehensive neuropsychological assessment. Volume of the cerebellum and its lobules was measured in those who underwent a 3 Tesla‐magnetic resonance scan.ResultsTwenty‐one patients underwent a complete assessment, including 71% scoring lower than the cutoff at the Montreal Cognitive assessment and 71% having a definite cerebellar cognitive affective/Schmahmann syndrome. Three patients had dementia and seven met the criteria of mild cognitive impairment. Severity of cognitive impairment did not correlate with severity of clinical manifestations. Performance at memory and visuospatial functions tests negatively correlated with the severity of cerebellar manifestations.ConclusionCognitive manifestations are frequent in RFC1‐related disorders. They should be included in the phenotype and screened systematically. © 2024 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

show abstract

“…The MoCA is a commonly used brief screening tool in the detection of both MiND and MaND [96,97] and is available in different languages (e.g. French, Japanese, Kiswahili, Portuguese, Russian) [98][99][100][101][102]. The MoCA naming subtest includes three line drawings of animals, which differ between the different versions of MoCA, so that cultural differences are taken into account and cultural bias is minimized [103,104].…”

Section: Naming Test Embedded In the Montreal Cognitive Assessmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

Naming ability assessment in neurocognitive disorders: a clinician’s perspective

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Detecting impaired naming capacity is valuable in diagnosing neurocognitive disorders (ND). A. clinical practice- oriented overview of naming tests validated in ND is not available yet. Here, features of naming tests with validated utility in ND which are open access or available for purchase are succinctly presented and compared. Methods Searches were carried out across Pubmed, Medline and Google Scholar. Additional studies were identified by searching reference lists. Only peer-reviewed journal articles were eligible. A narrative- and tabullar synthesis was used to summarize different aspects of the naming assessment instruments used in patients with ND such as stimuli type, administration time, assessment parameters and accessibility. Based on computational word frequency calculations, the tests were compared in terms of the average frequency of their linguistic content. Results Twelve naming tests, relying either on visual or auditory stimuli have been validated in ND. Their content and administration time vary between three and 60 items and one and 20 minutes, respectively. The average frequency of the words of each considered test was two or lower, pointing to low frequency of most items. In all but one test, scoring systems are exclusively based on correctly named items. Seven instruments are open access and four are available in more than one language. Conclusions Gaining insights into naming tests’ characteristics may catalyze the wide incorporation of those with short administration time but high diagnostic accuracy into the diagnostic workup of ND at primary healthcare and of extensive, visual or auditory ones into the diagnostic endeavors of memory clinics, as well as of secondary and tertiary brain healthcare settings.

show abstract

Validation in French of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment 5-Minute, a brief cognitive screening test for phone administration

Cited by 11 publications

References 16 publications

Long-term effects of restriction of intravenous fluid in adult ICU patients with septic shock

Long-term effects of restriction of intravenous fluid in adult ICU patients with septic shock

Cognitive Impairment Is Part of the Phenotype of Cerebellar Ataxia, Neuropathy, Vestibular Areflexia Syndrome (CANVAS)

Naming ability assessment in neurocognitive disorders: a clinician’s perspective

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About