Validation française de l’Ambivalence Toward Men Inventory : L’échelle de sexisme ambivalent envers les hommes.

Bosscher, Sabine de; Baron, Charlotte; Benbouriche, Massil; Remy, Ludovic; Varet, Florent

doi:10.1037/cbs0000361

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 35 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The number of excluded participants was particularly high, which may raise questions about the quality of the sample. Given that this rate is not as high in studies using a similar combination of exclusion criteria (Abbey et al, 2021;De Bosscher et al, 2023), it could be related to a large number of inattentive participants in this panel, possibly due to the incentive structure of the panel or the possibly boring nature of the survey. More importantly, the present study did not examine the convergent and divergent validity of the TRPL scale.…”

Section: Additional Limitations and Perspectivesmentioning

confidence: 96%

Toward a multidimensional model of legitimacy: Validation of the Traffic Rules Perceived Legitimacy scale.

Varet,

Pelé,

Carnis

et al. 2024

Psychology, Public Policy, and Law

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Perceived legitimacy is important, often more so than deterrence, to explain and improve compliance with legal rules. However, several issues in the definition and measurement of perceived legitimacy have recently been highlighted in different fields. A previous review of the literature (Varet et al., 2021), carried out on this issue, in the field of road safety, proposed a multidimensional model of the perceived legitimacy of traffic rules. The present study developed and tested theses insights through the validation of a self-report scale: the Traffic Rules Perceived Legitimacy scale. A hierarchical model underlying the scale was hypothesized with two second-order factors (i.e., instrumental factor, normative factor) and four first-order factors (i.e., effectiveness, efficiency, moral alignment, fairness). A pilot study (N = 74) was designed to pretest a pool of items. The main study (N = 833) was designed to assess the internal and external validity of the proposed scale, and a quicker single-item measure. The results corroborate the internal validity of the scale and the hypothesized hierarchical model. As expected, hierarchical regression analyses confirmed that the perceived legitimacy of traffic rules was a better predictor of compliance than perceived deterrence, risk of accident, and social norms. The value and limitations of the corroborated model for defining and measuring the perceived legitimacy of other objects, within and beyond the field of road safety, are discussed. Practical implications in the field of road safety field are also discussed.

show abstract

Section: Additional Limitations and Perspectivesmentioning

confidence: 96%

Toward a multidimensional model of legitimacy: Validation of the Traffic Rules Perceived Legitimacy scale.

Varet,

Pelé,

Carnis

et al. 2024

Psychology, Public Policy, and Law

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The number of excluded participants was particularly high, which may raises questions about the quality of the sample. Given that this rate is not as high in studies using a similar combination of exclusion criteria (Abbey et al, 2021;De Bosscher et al, 2023), it could be related to a large number of inattentive participants in this panel, possibly due to the incentive structure of the panel or the possibly boring nature of the survey. More importantly, the present study did not examine the convergent and divergent validity of the TRLP scale.…”

Section: Additional Limitations and Perspectivesmentioning

confidence: 96%

Towards a Multidimensional Model of Legitimacy: Validation of the Traffic Rules Perceived Legitimacy scale

Varet,

Piermattéo,

Pelé

et al. 2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Perceived legitimacy is important, often more so than deterrence, to explain and improve compliance with legal rules. However, several issues in the definition and measurement of perceived legitimacy have recently been highlighted and in different fields. A previous review of the literature (Varet et al., 2021), carried out on this issue, in the field of road safety, proposed a multidimensional model of the perceived legitimacy of traffic rules. The present study developed and tested theses insights through the validation of a self-report scale: the Traffic Rules Perceived Legitimacy scale. A hierarchical model underlying the scale was hypothesized with two second-order factors (i.e., instrumental factor, normative factor) and four first-order factors (i.e., effectiveness, efficiency, moral alignment, fairness). A pilot study (N = 74) was designed to pre-test a pool of items. The main study (N = 833) was designed to assess the internal and the external validity of the proposed scale, and a quicker single-item measure. The results corroborate the internal validity of the scale and the hypothesized hierarchical model. As expected, hierarchical regression analyses confirmed that the perceived legitimacy of traffic rules was a better predictor of compliance than perceived deterrence, risk of accident, and social norms. The value and limitations of the corroborated model for defining and measuring the perceived legitimacy of other objects, within and beyond the field of road safety, are discussed. Practical implications in the field of road safety field are also discussed.

show abstract

Validation française de l’Ambivalence Toward Men Inventory : L’échelle de sexisme ambivalent envers les hommes.

Cited by 2 publications

References 35 publications

Toward a multidimensional model of legitimacy: Validation of the Traffic Rules Perceived Legitimacy scale.

Toward a multidimensional model of legitimacy: Validation of the Traffic Rules Perceived Legitimacy scale.

Towards a Multidimensional Model of Legitimacy: Validation of the Traffic Rules Perceived Legitimacy scale

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About