Validation and use of the Second Victim Experience and Support Tool questionnaire: a scoping review

Dato Md Yusof, Y.J.; Ng, Q.X.; Teoh, S.E.; Loh, C.Y.L.; Xin, X.; Thumboo, J.

doi:10.1016/j.puhe.2023.08.003

Cited by 3 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 42 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In the most severe instances, these incidents can lead to Second Victim Syndrome (SVS), which is a serious consequence arising from adverse patient events or medical errors that traumatise healthcare providers [ 1 , 2 ]. It is estimated that around 50% of healthcare providers have experienced SVS at some point of their careers [ 3 , 4 ], underscoring its significance as a pervasive issue in the healthcare field. While the causes of SVS vary, its effects are notably more pronounced amongst specific groups, including surgeons, anaesthesiologists, paediatricians, obstetricians, and gynecologists [ 5 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Surgeons still remain a relatively under-research cohort despite the fact that they frequently confront high-stress scenarios and professional hurdles, and are presumably at heightened susceptibility to SVS. Existing studies predominantly focus on physicians [ 3 , 4 ], inadvertently perpetuating the prevalent, but unhealthy, stereotype in the surgical domain where demonstrating resilience and emotional control is expected [ 9 , 10 ]. Often, untoward incidents are attributed to technical lapses or inadequate preoperative or intraoperative decisions [ 10 , 11 ], consequently emphasising technical aspects in discussions and sidelining the emotional aftermath [ 5 , 10 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Intraoperative adverse events among surgeons in Singapore: a multicentre cross-sectional study on impact and support

Yaow,

Ng,

Chong

et al. 2024

BMC Health Serv Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background It is known that many surgeons encounter intraoperative adverse events which can result in Second Victim Syndrome (SVS), with significant detriment to their emotional and physical health. There is, however, a paucity of Asian studies in this space. The present study thus aimed to explore the degree to which the experience of an adverse event is common among surgeons in Singapore, as well as its impact, and factors affecting their responses and perceived support systems. Methods A self-administered survey was sent to surgeons at four large tertiary hospitals. The 42-item questionnaire used a systematic closed and open approach, to assess: Personal experience with intraoperative adverse events, emotional, psychological and physical impact of these events and perceived support systems. Results The response rate was 57.5% (n = 196). Most respondents were male (54.8%), between 35 and 44 years old, and holding the senior consultant position. In the past 12 months alone, 68.9% recalled an adverse event. The emotional impact was significant, including sadness (63.1%), guilt (53.1%) and anxiety (45.4%). Speaking to colleagues was the most helpful support source (66.7%) and almost all surgeons did not receive counselling (93.3%), with the majority deeming it unnecessary (72.2%). Notably, 68.1% of the surgeons had positive takeaways, gaining new insight and improving vigilance towards errors. Both gender and surgeon experience did not affect the likelihood of errors and emotional impact, but more experienced surgeons were less likely to have positive takeaways (p = 0.035). Individuals may become advocates for patient safety, while simultaneously championing the cause of psychological support for others. Conclusions Intraoperative adverse events are prevalent and its emotional impact is significant, regardless of the surgeon’s experience or gender. While colleagues and peer discussions are a pillar of support, healthcare institutions should do more to address the impact and ensuing consequences.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Intraoperative adverse events among surgeons in Singapore: a multicentre cross-sectional study on impact and support

Yaow,

Ng,

Chong

et al. 2024

BMC Health Serv Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Scoping review of the second victim syndrome among surgeons: Understanding the impact, responses, and support systems

Chong,

Yaow,

Chong

et al. 2024

The American Journal of Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Second victim experiences and impact among acute care nurses: An exploratory study

Lim,

Zainal,

Lee

et al. 2024

International Nursing Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

AimTo explore the experience of second victim symptoms and adverse outcomes among nurses working in public healthcare institutions; understand the preferred components of a structured support programme; and explore the barriers to accessing existing support strategies.BackgroundThe second victim phenomenon is experienced by nurses during patient‐related adverse events, requiring further exploration.MethodsA mixed‐methods design. Second Victim Experience and Support Tool and semi‐structured individual interviews were used among nurses involved in adverse events that occurred from January 2022 to April 2023. Descriptive statistics was used to describe sociodemographic characteristics and survey responses. Thematic analysis was used to analyse qualitative data.ResultsNurses (n = 12) experienced second victim‐related physical, psychological and professional distress (58.3% to 83.3%) within one month after the event. Nurses continued to experience second victim–related distress (58.3%) three months after and turnover intentions (58.4%). Having a respected peer to discuss what happened was the most desired component of a support programme (75.0%). Five qualitative themes: (i) whirlwind of immediate emotions, (ii) lasting impact of adverse events, (iii) organisational barriers, (iv) coping resources at organisational level and (v) positive individual coping strategies.DiscussionNurses experienced immediate and profound distress, highlighting the pervasive and distressing nature of the second victim phenomenon.ConclusionIt is critical to recognise the second victim phenomenon and improve organisational climate to provide adequate support to affected nurses.Implications for nursing and health policyOrganisations can establish a structured second victim support system, allowing nurses to seek emotional aid during the occurrence of adverse events. Establishing national policies as guidelines for organisations to refer to, raise awareness of the second victim phenomenon, and provide a standardised approach for identification and intervention for affected nurses.

show abstract

Validation and use of the Second Victim Experience and Support Tool questionnaire: a scoping review

Cited by 3 publications

References 42 publications

Intraoperative adverse events among surgeons in Singapore: a multicentre cross-sectional study on impact and support

Intraoperative adverse events among surgeons in Singapore: a multicentre cross-sectional study on impact and support

Scoping review of the second victim syndrome among surgeons: Understanding the impact, responses, and support systems

Second victim experiences and impact among acute care nurses: An exploratory study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About