2000
DOI: 10.1097/00004647-200007000-00011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation and Reproducibility of Measurement of 5-HT1A Receptor Parameters with [carbonyl-11C]WAY-100635 in Humans: Comparison of Arterial and Reference Tissue Input Functions

Abstract: Serotonin 5-HT(1A) receptors are implicated in the pathophysiology of neuropsychiatric conditions. The goal of this study was to evaluate methods to derive 5-HT(1A) receptor parameters in the human brain with positron emission tomography (PET) and [carbonyl-(11)C]WAY 100635. Five healthy volunteer subjects were studied twice. Three methods of analysis were used to derive the binding potential (BP), and the specific to nonspecific equilibrium partition coefficient (k3/k4). Two methods, kinetic analysis based on… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
240
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 211 publications
(254 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
13
240
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the unconstrained 2TC model fit the TACs well, in light of the observed unexpected increase in binding between test and retest, the data were modeled using four additional techniques: (1) a 2TC model constrained such that the ratio of kinetic constants, K 1 /k 2 , for each region is restricted to the ratio of K 1 to k 2 in the reference region (Parsey et al, 2000b), (2) a 2TC model fit using non-iterative methods in which the experimental data are matched to the most similar curve in a library of precalculated functions, rather than by performing a nonlinear least squares iterative fit, (3) Logan graphical analysis, in which outcome measures are calculated from the slope of the linear part of an integral plot (Logan et al, 1996), and (4) likelihood estimation in graphical analysis, which has been shown to reduce bias introduced by the Logan approach (Ogden, 2003). One-tissue compartment models were not used in the comparison because they did not fit the data well (data not shown).…”
Section: Test-retest Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the unconstrained 2TC model fit the TACs well, in light of the observed unexpected increase in binding between test and retest, the data were modeled using four additional techniques: (1) a 2TC model constrained such that the ratio of kinetic constants, K 1 /k 2 , for each region is restricted to the ratio of K 1 to k 2 in the reference region (Parsey et al, 2000b), (2) a 2TC model fit using non-iterative methods in which the experimental data are matched to the most similar curve in a library of precalculated functions, rather than by performing a nonlinear least squares iterative fit, (3) Logan graphical analysis, in which outcome measures are calculated from the slope of the linear part of an integral plot (Logan et al, 1996), and (4) likelihood estimation in graphical analysis, which has been shown to reduce bias introduced by the Logan approach (Ogden, 2003). One-tissue compartment models were not used in the comparison because they did not fit the data well (data not shown).…”
Section: Test-retest Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to the alternative plasma input function method (PIFM), the SRTM underestimates BP values, particularly in regions of higher receptor density (Oikonen et al, 2000;Parsey et al, 2000;Slifstein et al, 2000). It may thus be less sensitiveFa concern when low levels of occupancy are being investigated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PET imaging sessions were conducted as previously described (Parsey et al 2000). Subject preparation included placement of arterial and venous catheters, fiducial markers and polyurethane head immobilizer.…”
Section: Pet Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The six measured fractions of parent compound were fitted to the sum of one exponential plus a constant in order to interpolate values between and after these measurements (Parsey et al 2000). The input function was calculated as the product of the total counts and interpolated fraction of parent compound at each time.…”
Section: Input Function Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation