2018
DOI: 10.1107/s2053273318094494
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation and quality assessment of macromolecular structures using complex network analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The extent of change of the contacts was analyzed by packing analysis of the structures using graph nodes described recently 56 . Here we calculated graphs of intra residue interactions within a 4.6 Å radius using only nonhydrogen atoms and disregarding two neighboring residues in the chain.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The extent of change of the contacts was analyzed by packing analysis of the structures using graph nodes described recently 56 . Here we calculated graphs of intra residue interactions within a 4.6 Å radius using only nonhydrogen atoms and disregarding two neighboring residues in the chain.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to this, 3D predictive models generated from this project, like the one we provided for AUH26_00140, should be further validated for accuracy. Procheck and other free webbased programs check the stereochemical quality of a model's structure, such as deviations from ideal bonding angles and bond length, and produce a Ramachandran plot identifying outliers and clashing contacts which is a standard part of structure analysis before deposition (Praznikar et al, 2019). Further, after completion of the project, selected HPs and identified similarly sequenced proteins with established annotation should undergo additional comparisons to support re-annotation conclusions.…”
Section: Further Computational Analysis Expands the Hpcp For Advancedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In proteins, some regions and strands may be intrinsically disordered such that they cannot be resolved by x-ray diffraction irrespective on the resolution and the overall quality of the experimental data. For this reason, the Z-score has been used as a measure of local model accuracy [46,47]. The Z-score is given by Z = (R − R res )/σ res [46][47][48], where R res and σ res are respectively the expected R-factor and the standard deviation of the R-factor values, calculated with the same amino acid in structures within the same resolution range.…”
Section: N-sh2 Domain Loops Are Characterized By Structural Disordermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason, the Z-score has been used as a measure of local model accuracy [46,47]. The Z-score is given by Z = (R − R res )/σ res [46][47][48], where R res and σ res are respectively the expected R-factor and the standard deviation of the R-factor values, calculated with the same amino acid in structures within the same resolution range. For instance, for the case of 2SHP with a resolution of 1.95 Å, the R-factor of each residue is compared with the expected R-factor and standard deviation detected from the same kind of residue in all structures of the database with resolution between 1.8 and 2.0 Å [48].…”
Section: N-sh2 Domain Loops Are Characterized By Structural Disordermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation