2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2014.03.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation and psychometric properties of the German Capability for Suicide Questionnaire

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
50
1
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
6
50
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the daily assessments referred to the past day (instead of the particular moment) and were based on one‐item measures which might have confounded the results and potentially might have limited the reliability of the assessments. Yet, validity of the EMA items was supported by correlations with respective subscales of the GCSQ (Wachtel et al., ), corroborating the validity of the EMA results. In general, the operationalization of CS requires further work (Chu et al., ; Klonsky et al., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Moreover, the daily assessments referred to the past day (instead of the particular moment) and were based on one‐item measures which might have confounded the results and potentially might have limited the reliability of the assessments. Yet, validity of the EMA items was supported by correlations with respective subscales of the GCSQ (Wachtel et al., ), corroborating the validity of the EMA results. In general, the operationalization of CS requires further work (Chu et al., ; Klonsky et al., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Every evening at 8:00 p.m., participants were prompted a signal and asked to rate their level of CS referring to the past day on a 5‐point scale from “1” (do not agree at all) to “5” (fully agree) that were rescaled for analysis to 0–4 with three items capturing pain tolerance, fearlessness about death, and perceived CS. All items were selected from two German measures of CS (Spangenberg et al., ; Wachtel et al., ) and reformulated to capture variability in the construct. All EMA items were presented in German (see Table for CS item wordings).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Additionally, Smith, Wolford-Clevenger, et al (2013) found that the ACSS was, in a separate study of the current sample of incarcerated men, comprised of three interpretable factors: General Fearlessness and Pain Tolerance, Death Specific Fearlessness, and Spectator Enjoyment of Violence. Further still, other researchers have developed additional items, scales, and alternative models of the ACS and its components (Klonsky & May, 2015; Wachtel, Siegmann, et al, 2014; Wachtel, Vocks, et al, 2014). We examined three versions of the ACSS: the original 20-item ACSS, the 7-item Fearlessness about Death scale, and the three-factor scale identified by Smith, Wolford-Clevenger, et al (2013).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%