2017
DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.16799
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation and optimization of the Ion Torrent S5 XL sequencer and Oncomine workflow for BRCA1 and BRCA2 genetic testing

Abstract: In this study, we validated the analytical performance of BRCA1/2 sequencing using Ion Torrent's new bench-top sequencer with amplicon panel with optimized bioinformatics pipelines. Using 43 samples that were previously validated by Illumina's MiSeq platform and/or by Sanger sequencing/multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification, we amplified the target with the Oncomine™ BRCA Research Assay and sequenced on Ion Torrent S5 XL (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). We compared two bioinformatics pip… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The clean reads were mapped to the human reference genome (hg19). Variant caller was used to filter and call the mutations in targeted regions in each gene . Cutoff level for each mutant allele frequency was defined by “variant caller” for each sample (patient).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The clean reads were mapped to the human reference genome (hg19). Variant caller was used to filter and call the mutations in targeted regions in each gene . Cutoff level for each mutant allele frequency was defined by “variant caller” for each sample (patient).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Variant caller was used to filter and call the mutations in targeted regions in each gene. 24,25 Cutoff level for each mutant allele frequency was defined by "variant caller" for each sample (patient). The range of the limit of detection for the variants in KRAS and NRAS was from 0.05 to 0.20 in this study.…”
Section: Blood Samples Ctdna Isolation and Sequencingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The total cost per sample when sequencing 16 samples on an Illumina MiSeq 500V2 Nano run was $76.25 and $81.07 using the Nextera XT and Kapa HyperPlus kits, respectively, compared to $129.38 and $134.20 when sequencing on a standard Illumina MiSeq 500V2 run. The cost per sample for an Ion Torrent S5 510 chip run closely matched the cost per sample of an Ion Torrent PGM 318v2 run ($124.18 and $125.04 respectively when sequencing 16 samples, Figure 6), with the S5 510 chip producing more high quality reads with a shorter run time than the PGM 318 chip (Figure 2, Table S4) (34). When comparing the Ion Torrent S5 and the Illumina MiSeq system, the difference in the cost per sample decreases with increased multiplexing.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…The Ion S5-xl platform and the Hiseq 2500 platform are two commercially available sequencing platforms that target both clinical applications and laboratories [17]. There are many 16s sequencing platforms for microbiota analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%