2019
DOI: 10.1111/phn.12688
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation and evaluation of the Mandarin version of the oral health literacy adult questionnaire in Taiwan

Abstract: Objectives This study aimed to translate the Oral Health Literacy Adult Questionnaire into a Mandarin version (MOHL‐AQ) and to examine its psychometric properties. Methods A methodological research using psychometric testing and evaluation of a translated instrument. A convenience sample of 402 participants from northern Taiwan were recruited for the validation of the MOHL‐AQ. Internal consistency reliability, split‐half reliability, inter‐rater reliability, face validity, content validity, and construct valid… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(34 reference statements)
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Ours is the first study to evaluate measurement properties of OHL-AQ using IRT-based methods compared to previous studies [13][14][15][16] that have used classical testing methods. More specifically, our study is unique in its assessment of OHL-AQ's measurement precision.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ours is the first study to evaluate measurement properties of OHL-AQ using IRT-based methods compared to previous studies [13][14][15][16] that have used classical testing methods. More specifically, our study is unique in its assessment of OHL-AQ's measurement precision.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 Since then, psychometric soundness of OHL-AQ has been supported in other cultures. [14][15][16] Yet, OHL-AQ is still a relatively new instrument and its use has been limited. OHL-AQ was designed to assess OHL in communityor population-based studies.…”
Section: Assessment Instruments For Ohl; a Multidimensional Constructmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used the Mandarin version of the Oral Health Literacy Adult Questionnaire (OHL-AQ), which was translated by Ho et al (2020) [ 35 ] from the original version, which was developed by Naghibi Sistani et al (2014) [ 36 ]. The expert content validity index (CVI) for all items was > 0.90.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MOHL-AQ was published by Ho et al (2019) [14]. The overall content validity is 95%; inter-rater reliability is 98%, and Cronbach's α coefficient value is 0.77.…”
Section: The Mandarin Version Of the Oral Health Literacy Adult Questionnaire (Mohl-aq)mentioning
confidence: 99%