2012
DOI: 10.1016/s1665-2681(19)31410-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation and comparison of simple noninvasive models for the prediction of liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was in agreement with many authors. [28][29][30][31][32] The viral load correlated positively with the hepatic fibrosis severity and AFP, whereas RBP4 correlated positively with the platelet count, and negatively with fibrosis stage, viral load, AFP, and the five non-invasive fibrosis indices (APRI, CDS, Fib-4, GUCI, Lok index). PLR correlated negatively with fibrosis stage and the five non-invasive fibrosis indices.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This was in agreement with many authors. [28][29][30][31][32] The viral load correlated positively with the hepatic fibrosis severity and AFP, whereas RBP4 correlated positively with the platelet count, and negatively with fibrosis stage, viral load, AFP, and the five non-invasive fibrosis indices (APRI, CDS, Fib-4, GUCI, Lok index). PLR correlated negatively with fibrosis stage and the five non-invasive fibrosis indices.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was in line with the finding of other authors. [29][30][31][32][33][34][35] RBP4 is the most superior, likewise fibroscan, with an outstanding performance in predicting significant and advanced fibrosis, followed by Fib-4 score, GUCI, APRI, LOK index, CDC, and PLR. This is in line with other authors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[11,12] The APRI and FIB-4 scores have been reported to identify hepatitis C-related fibrosis in many studies, thus alleviating the need for the invasive liver biopsy. [10,13,14] Sonderup et al [15] emphasised the importance of these scores in the assessment of liver fibrosis in the context of hepatitis C in sub-Saharan Africa, as they are cheap, available, easy to interpret and can be done in an outpatient setting. However, these scores have not been reported on in HCV-infected individuals in SA or sub-Saharan Africa.…”
Section: Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar results have been reported by others. [13,14] Implementing these scores in clinical practice can reduce the need for invasive liver biopsies. Interestingly, the same fibrosis scores have been found to have limitations when used in hepatitis B patients.…”
Section: Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[6] However, APRI, FIB-4, and FIB-5 scoring systems seem to be insufficient in some studies to differentiate early stage fibrosis from advanced fibrosis due to their low sensitivity and positive predictive values. [7] Our study was designed to evaluate how effective the APRI, FIB-4, and FIB-5 scoring systems are in predicting liver fibrosis in CHB patients who underwent liver biopsy for treatment decision.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%