1999
DOI: 10.1109/6144.774740
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation and application of different experimental techniques to measure electronic component operating junction temperature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For these methods no additional equipment is needed. Commonly, diodes either in forward or reverse direction usually act as integrated temperature sensors [3][4][5]. This requires dedicated test structures, which leads to more design effort and increasing costs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For these methods no additional equipment is needed. Commonly, diodes either in forward or reverse direction usually act as integrated temperature sensors [3][4][5]. This requires dedicated test structures, which leads to more design effort and increasing costs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the example depicted in Fig. 5, steady state thermal performance of an isolated SO-8 package is experimentally characterised on five thermal test PWBs [6]. The study includes three FR4 and two insulated metal substrate (IMS) standard test PWBs, each displaying a different internal structure and effective thermal conductivity.…”
Section: Heat Conduction In Pwbsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SO-8 test component contained a G423, 0.63 x 0.63mm thermal test die from Infineon [22], and the SBGA352 package from Amkor contained a 10.16mm square, PST6 test die. Each die had the functionality that allowed it dissipate power, while simultaneously allowing the operating junction temperature to be measured by monitoring the forward biased voltage across a centrally mounted diode [23]. The temperature sensitive diode of each test die was calibrated in accordance with JEDEC standard EIA/JESD 51-1 [24] to an accuracy of ±0.5°C, and the power dissipation level (Q) could be controlled to ±0.1%.…”
Section: A) Thermal Test Componentsmentioning
confidence: 99%