2021
DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.13669
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation analysis of a composite real‐world mortality endpoint for patients with cancer in the United States

Abstract: Objective We expanded the previous assessment of a mortality variable suited for real‐world evidence‐focused oncology research. Data source We used a nationwide electronic health record (EHR)‐derived de‐identified database. Data collection We included patients with at least 1 of 18 cancer types between January 1, 2011 and December 31, 2017. Patient‐level structured data (EHRs, obituaries, and Social Security Death Index) and unstructured EHR data (abstracted) were linked to generate a composite mortality varia… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
100
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
100
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For censoring, the last confirmed activity date (i.e., last structured visit or last oral cancer drug episode from unstructured data) was used. Dates of death were based on a composite mortality variable [ 9 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For censoring, the last confirmed activity date (i.e., last structured visit or last oral cancer drug episode from unstructured data) was used. Dates of death were based on a composite mortality variable [ 9 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Date of death was a composite end point on the basis of mortality data curated from structured and unstructured information in the EHRs (eg, clinician notes), obituary records, or the Social Security Death Index. 15 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NGS testing dates were abstracted along (20). Death dates were determined via a previously described mortality variable (21). Patients are considered ALK positive (ALK+) or EGFR positive (EGFR+) if they have a positive result any time before the advanced NSCLC diagnosis date plus 60 days.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%