2016
DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.846.67
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validating the k-ω Turbulence Model for 3D Flows within the CFD Solver Eilmer

Abstract: The computational fluid dynamics solver Eilmer has proven useful to The University of Queensland’s Centre for Hypersonics for its ability to simulate high-speed compressible flows. In Eilmer, turbulence is modelled using Wilcox’s 2006 k-ω model. While the turbulence model implementation has been validated for two-dimensional and axisymmetric flows, validation is required for three-dimensional flows. The present paper describes the progress of the validation of the k-ω turbulence model for two three-dimensional… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the degree of accuracy of the calculated skin friction coefficient, the boundary layer profiles are observed to deviate from the experimental data by some small amount. A similar result has been reported for Eilmer's structured grid explicit solver [162]. One proposed reason for this discrepancy is that the k − ω turbulence model is developing the boundary layer slower than in reality.…”
Section: Numerical Setupsupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite the degree of accuracy of the calculated skin friction coefficient, the boundary layer profiles are observed to deviate from the experimental data by some small amount. A similar result has been reported for Eilmer's structured grid explicit solver [162]. One proposed reason for this discrepancy is that the k − ω turbulence model is developing the boundary layer slower than in reality.…”
Section: Numerical Setupsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The experimental data for this validation case was originally reported by Mabey et al [160], and was included in a critical compilation of compressible turbulent boundary data by AGARD [161]. This data has been used to validate the k − ω turbulence model in a previous version of Eilmer [88], and has been more recently used to validate the k − ω turbulence model in Eilmer's structured-grid explicit solver [162]. The flat plate was tested in the supersonic wind tunnel at R.A.E.…”
Section: Turbulent Flat Platementioning
confidence: 99%