2023
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066560
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validating the InterVA-5 cause of death analytical tool: using mortality data from the Comprehensive Health and Epidemiological Surveillance System in Papua New Guinea

Bang Nguyen Pham,
Norah Abori,
Seri Maraga
et al.

Abstract: ObjectiveInterVA-5 is a new version of an analytical tool for cause of death (COD) analysis at the population level. This study validates the InterVA-5 against the medical review method, using mortality data in Papua New Guinea (PNG).Design and settingThis study used mortality data collected from January 2018 to December 2020 in eight surveillance sites of the Comprehensive Health and Epidemiological Surveillance System (CHESS), established by the PNG Institute of Medical Research in six major provinces.Method… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While 10.2% of the women died of cardiovascular and circulatory disorders, other and unspecified cardiac diseases were the third leading CoD, comprising more than half of the cardiovascular and circulatory disorders. Although cardiac diseases in general are prevalent and among the leading top CoD in Ethiopia [ 37 , 38 ], report show that other and unspecified cardiac diseases may have low positive predictive value against medical review [ 39 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While 10.2% of the women died of cardiovascular and circulatory disorders, other and unspecified cardiac diseases were the third leading CoD, comprising more than half of the cardiovascular and circulatory disorders. Although cardiac diseases in general are prevalent and among the leading top CoD in Ethiopia [ 37 , 38 ], report show that other and unspecified cardiac diseases may have low positive predictive value against medical review [ 39 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the data were collected in 2021, reflecting the household SES in 2020, the study's results may not fully represent the current COVID-19 situation in PNG, which might have evolved over time. [31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41] Lastly, the study's focus on household-level data may have limited the ability to explore individual-level factors and their associations with COVID-19 health issues comprehensively (online supplementary file 2). Future research may benefit from more representative sampling, improved data collection methods, and a broader scope of individual and community-level factors.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%