2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.03.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validating the independent components of neuroimaging time series via clustering and visualization

Abstract: Recently, independent component analysis (ICA) has been widely used in the analysis of brain imaging data. An important problem with most ICA algorithms is, however, that they are stochastic; that is, their results may be somewhat different in different runs of the algorithm. Thus, the outputs of a single run of an ICA algorithm should be interpreted with some reserve, and further analysis of the algorithmic reliability of the components is needed. Moreover, as with any statistical method, the results are affe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
684
1
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,109 publications
(722 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
3
684
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…2004). The IC validation, in terms of task relatedness, is determined by (1) the spectral power of each IC time course at the task frequency and (2) the phase of each IC time course relative to the task reference function (Schmithorst et al.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2004). The IC validation, in terms of task relatedness, is determined by (1) the spectral power of each IC time course at the task frequency and (2) the phase of each IC time course relative to the task reference function (Schmithorst et al.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We selected 60 components with the largest eigenvalues. Then, FastICA was run 30 times with different initial conditions and the data were bootstrapped (Himberg et al, 2004). The contrast function was based on skewness.…”
Section: Clustering Of Human Neoplasms Based On Amplification Profilesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The optimal number of gICA components was determined to be 70 using a modified version of ICASSO (RRID:SCR_014981; ICASSO was included in the GIFT v4.0a package; http://mialab.mrn.org/software/gift/) (Himberg, Hyvärinen, & Esposito, 2004; Ma et al., 2011) such that the overall R‐index is close to the minimum and the index quality of at most two components falls below 0.7. The R‐index as defined in Himberg et al., (2004) is a cluster validity index (Levine & Domany, 2001) that constitutes a measure of compactness and separation of independent components.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The R‐index as defined in Himberg et al., (2004) is a cluster validity index (Levine & Domany, 2001) that constitutes a measure of compactness and separation of independent components. This setup was considered a good consistency trade‐off between RSN quality and clustering validity (R‐index) considering the differences among all four pipelines.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%