2019
DOI: 10.1177/0361198119843097
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validating the Adaptability of Travel Time Reliability Measurements using Probe Data

Abstract: Travel time reliability (TTR) is considered a critical piece of information in highway performance evaluation. The L02 project from Strategic Highway Research Program 2 (SHRP2) has developed a holistic method using statistical probability functions of travel time as the TTR measure to build highway performance evaluation and monitoring systems. Compared with single-value reliability measures, the L02 measure is able to identify sources of unreliability and quantify their associated impacts. To validate the ada… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(33 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Strategic Highway Research Program 2 (SHRP2) launched a series of projects that aimed to develop tools and systems for TTR monitoring and evaluation (37)(38)(39). The SHRP2 L02 project proposed a holistic method of describing TTR with the probability density function (PDF) and cumulative density function (CDF), which has been proved to be an effective TTR measurement (40). To evaluate the influence of non-recurrent factors on travel time, the method introduces a concept of regime, which is a combination of congestion level and non-recurrent factors, for example, incident, adverse weather, and work zone.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Strategic Highway Research Program 2 (SHRP2) launched a series of projects that aimed to develop tools and systems for TTR monitoring and evaluation (37)(38)(39). The SHRP2 L02 project proposed a holistic method of describing TTR with the probability density function (PDF) and cumulative density function (CDF), which has been proved to be an effective TTR measurement (40). To evaluate the influence of non-recurrent factors on travel time, the method introduces a concept of regime, which is a combination of congestion level and non-recurrent factors, for example, incident, adverse weather, and work zone.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To evaluate and understand CV probe data, researchers commonly use several key metrics, including market penetration rates, speed bias, coverage, travel time, latency, buffer index, planning index, and similarity index (2,12,(16)(17)(18). However, the selection of the performance metrics depends on the target applications.…”
Section: Connected Vehicle Data Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data for computing, analyzing, and modeling travel time performance-based measures are captured using different types of probe data collection systems such as test vehicles, Bluetooth detectors, toll tag readers, license plate readers, road-side sensors, cell phone tracking, automatic vehicle location, and global positioning systems (Brennan et al, 2018;Chen et al, 2019;Federal Highway Administration [FHWA], 2017;Lu & Dong, 2018;Martchouk et al, 2011;Singh et al, 2019). The data collected were used for characterizing congestion (Brennan et al, 2018), validating the adaptability of travel time performance-based measures (Chen et al, 2019), estimating travel time (Lu & Dong, 2018), exploring travel time reliability (FHWA (Federal Highway Administration), 2006;Lomax et al, 2004;Lyman & Bertini, 2008;Martchouk et al, 2011;McLeod et al, 2012;Sisiopiku & Islam, 2012;Van Lint & Van Zuylen, 2005), and examining distributions for modeling travel time or related reliability measures (Moylan & Rashidi, 2017;Yang & Wu, 2016;Zheng et al, 2017;Zhong et al, 2020;Zou et al, 2020). Heuristic and statistical methods were also explored to assess travel time reliability for various travel conditions (Abdel-Aty et al, 1995;Chen et al, 2002;Haitham & Emam, 2006;Du & Nicholson, 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%