2000
DOI: 10.3109/13645700009061458
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validating simulation and assessment devices in surgery: A review

Abstract: There are standard criteria for scientific soundness that should be used to guide the development of all measures. The most important of these are validity and reliability. These criteria ensure that the ' data produced can be used with a reasonable level of confidence. This paper reviews the procedures required to demonstrate the validity and reliability of surgical simulators. It is concluded that those involved in developing surgical simulators should focus their efforts on demonstrating the construct valid… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These parameters show significant differences between experts and novices. Therefore we have reasons to regard our model and testing setup as a valid measurement system for skills in laparoscopic surgery (discriminant validity) [2]. Also, the experience gained during a laparoscopic training course could be displayed and translated into measurement values: x c -value (transit profile parameter) increased, standardized time decreased, and error time became shorter.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These parameters show significant differences between experts and novices. Therefore we have reasons to regard our model and testing setup as a valid measurement system for skills in laparoscopic surgery (discriminant validity) [2]. Also, the experience gained during a laparoscopic training course could be displayed and translated into measurement values: x c -value (transit profile parameter) increased, standardized time decreased, and error time became shorter.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%