2018
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/aabe8f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validating Semi-analytic Models of High-redshift Galaxy Formation Using Radiation Hydrodynamical Simulations

Abstract: We use a cosmological hydrodynamic simulation calculated with Enzo and the semi-analytic galaxy formation model (SAM) GAMMA to address the chemical evolution of dwarf galaxies in the early universe. The long-term goal of the project is to better understand the origin of metal-poor stars and the formation of dwarf galaxies and the Milky Way halo by cross-validating these theoretical approaches. We combine GAMMA with the merger tree of the most massive galaxy found in the hydrodynamic simulation and compare the … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
55
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 136 publications
(173 reference statements)
4
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The stellar mass-halo mass relation from the higher resolution (0.7pc) simulations of Kimm et al (2017) predict that a halo with M vir = 10 7 M will host at most 1000M in stars (which is reasonably consistent with Xu et al 2016), with many systems scattering to much lower stellar masses. The stellar mass-halo mass relation of the SPHINX simulation ) is in good agreement with the Renaissance simulation (Xu et al 2016) at M vir 10 8 M where the effect of radiation is strongest (see also Figure 13 of Côté et al 2018). Because of the finite mass resolution in the SPHINX suite, we expect some stochasticity in our parameter f bright .…”
Section: Stellar Massessupporting
confidence: 72%
“…The stellar mass-halo mass relation from the higher resolution (0.7pc) simulations of Kimm et al (2017) predict that a halo with M vir = 10 7 M will host at most 1000M in stars (which is reasonably consistent with Xu et al 2016), with many systems scattering to much lower stellar masses. The stellar mass-halo mass relation of the SPHINX simulation ) is in good agreement with the Renaissance simulation (Xu et al 2016) at M vir 10 8 M where the effect of radiation is strongest (see also Figure 13 of Côté et al 2018). Because of the finite mass resolution in the SPHINX suite, we expect some stochasticity in our parameter f bright .…”
Section: Stellar Massessupporting
confidence: 72%
“…In this work, we combine these two quantities into f , the star formation efficiency in units of yr −1 . Here we assume that f is constant with time, but we refer to Côté et al (2018) for alternative prescriptions. The outflow rate is assumed to be proportional to the star formation rate, and defined as (e.g., Murray et al 2005;Muratov et al 2015)Ṁ…”
Section: Galaxy Model With Inflows and Outflowsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work, we ignore the interaction between the CGM and the intergalactic medium and seṫ M CGM,in andṀ CGM,out to zero at all times. We refer to our online documentation 7 and to Côté et al (2018) for details on how to activate such interaction.…”
Section: Circumgalactic Medium and Recyclingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using our GCE code OMEGA+ (Côté et al 2018), and assuming that the ejecta of this specific 20 M model at Z = 0.01 is representative of all 20 M stars at that metallicity, we overestimate the predicted evolution of [Cr/Fe] in the Milky Way by almost an order of magnitude at [Fe/H] ∼ 0. A question that emerges is whether or not Si-C shell mergers occur in nature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…2 https://github.com/becot85/JINAPyCEE 3 https://github.com/becot85/JINAPyCEE/blob/master/DOC/ OMEGA%2B_Milky_Way_model.ipynb Predicted evolution of [Cr/Fe] (top panel) and [V/Fe] (bottom panel) as a function of [Fe/H] for the Galactic disk using NuGrid yields(Ritter et al 2018b) and the GCE code OMEGA+(Côté et al 2018). The solid and dashed lines show the predictions when including or excluding the 20 M model at Z = 0.01, respectively.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%