2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0895-4356(00)00321-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validating recommendations for coronary angiography following acute myocardial infarction in the elderly

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

6
768
3
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,040 publications
(785 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
6
768
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…All confounders examined in this study displayed a standardized difference of the mean of less than 10%, indicating balanced levels of the confounders between alcohol flushers and non-flushers. [36][37][38] Supplemental Table 1 also presents findings indicating that the prevalence of alcohol flushing was relatively similar among all age groups, whereas age was associated with alcohol consumption. In addition, alcohol flushing was very closely related with alcohol consumption and associated phenotypes, including AST, ALT, and GGT especially in men.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All confounders examined in this study displayed a standardized difference of the mean of less than 10%, indicating balanced levels of the confounders between alcohol flushers and non-flushers. [36][37][38] Supplemental Table 1 also presents findings indicating that the prevalence of alcohol flushing was relatively similar among all age groups, whereas age was associated with alcohol consumption. In addition, alcohol flushing was very closely related with alcohol consumption and associated phenotypes, including AST, ALT, and GGT especially in men.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been suggested that a standardized difference of <10% likely denotes a negligible imbalance. [36][37][38] We then analyzed the association of alcohol consumption and associated phenotypes, such as AST, ALT, and GGT, with alcohol flushing status to determine whether alcohol flushing status was a good predictor of alcohol consumption. For log-transformed variables, mean differences on the log scale were converted to percentage differences.…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To assess covariate balance, we computed the standardized difference (d) for each of the characteristics described above before and after propensity-score adjustment. A general rule of thumb is that a standardized difference greater than 10 represents meaningful imbalance in a given covariate [20][21][22]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We acknowledge that this is somewhat oversimplified relative to the number of variables included when the propensity adjustment is applied in practice; and thus, the impact of just one omitted confound could be overstated. For example, studies of cardiovascular disease have included considerably more variables in the propensity score: 18 variables (Grzybowski et al, 2003), 34 variables (Gum et al, 2001) and 102 variables (Normand 2001). Nevertheless, when one large, time-varying confounding variable was omitted from the propensity score in the simulation study, the parameter estimate resulted in substantial bias, reduced coverage probability, and inflated type I error rates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%