Validating Personnel Selection: A Process Model for Research and Practice

Abstract

This article highlights the need for a clearer conceptual appreciation of the relationship among and between predictors and criteria, and for a better understanding of measurement issues in selection. A process model of selection is outlined that includes recent research on the changing relationships of ability to performance at different stages of skill acquisition, the interaction between type of task and validity, the role of motivational constructs in the measurement and validation process, and the reciprocally interacting influences of work experience and individual characteristics. Comment is offered on issues such as general versus specific abilities, the 'big five' in personality, aptitude by treatment or training interactions and maximal versus typical performance. Measurement issues are discussed throughout, but particularly in relation to the assessment process.raditionally the selection literature has

Selective Decisions: Challenging Orthodox Analyses of the Hiring Process

“…The full involvement and positive perceptions of candidates, therefore, are increasingly regarded as essential components of effective selection practice (Fletcher, 1996). One of the most detailed models to represent the interaction of social factors and assessment method design is Hesketh and Robertson's (1993) process model of selection method validation. Not only applicant perceptions, but also task demands and organisational conditions, are viewed as moderating how effectively a selection process captures the ability or performance construct of interest.…”

Psychological testing for selection purposes: a guide to evidence-based practice for human resource professionals

“…Due to the complexity of personality, the whole person approach does not give a meaningful score that can be used to rank order applicants. There is no 'p' in personality assessment to parallel 'g' in ability testing (Hesketh and Robertson 1993). In summary, best practice is to ensure that only job relevant personality data are reported to managers.…”

Towards a Theory of Socialization Impact: Selection as Pre‐Entry Socialization

“…In a field which has been criticized for a lack of theoretical developments (e.g. Hesketh and Robertson 1993;Cascio 1995;Borman, Hanson and Hedge 1997) this theory and model of socialization impact are proposed as an alternative, but wholly complementary, perspective and framework to stimulate and facilitate future empirical research in employee selection.…”