2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2010.03.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validating ICD coding algorithms for diabetes mellitus from administrative data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
115
1
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 138 publications
(123 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
4
115
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…25 Cunningham and colleagues 26 evaluated the quality of physician visit data (including inpatients and outpatient visits) in Alberta and concluded that physicians submitted a variety of ICD codes for claims and that the face validity of diagnosis coded in physician claims is substantially high. In keeping with our findings, 2 Canadian studies (Quan and colleagues 11 and Chen and colleagues 5 ) analyzed inpatient and outpatient administrative data validity in defining hypertension and diabetes and did not find significant changes between 2001 and 2014. However, Januel and colleagues 9 reported that inpatient data validity improved after ICD-10 implementation in Switzerland.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…25 Cunningham and colleagues 26 evaluated the quality of physician visit data (including inpatients and outpatient visits) in Alberta and concluded that physicians submitted a variety of ICD codes for claims and that the face validity of diagnosis coded in physician claims is substantially high. In keeping with our findings, 2 Canadian studies (Quan and colleagues 11 and Chen and colleagues 5 ) analyzed inpatient and outpatient administrative data validity in defining hypertension and diabetes and did not find significant changes between 2001 and 2014. However, Januel and colleagues 9 reported that inpatient data validity improved after ICD-10 implementation in Switzerland.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…The published studies examined a relatively short period, usually conducting only 2 or 3 period comparisons over a maximum of 5 years. [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] To fill this gap, we conducted a study to examine the validity of administrative codes from the Discharge Abstract Database for hypertension and diabetes between 2002 and 2013. We used a prospective clinical registry, the Alberta Provincial Project for Outcome Assessment in Coronary Heart Disease (APPROACH) database, as the reference standard.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although individuals responsible for ICD coding in the DAD receive standardized training in Canada (33), there may still be coding variations across provinces that could limit the generalizability of these findings. Previous studies have compared the validity of case identification using administrative data against chart review in the areas of hypertension and diabetes mellitus, and found that the sensitivity results (diabetes mellitus range 90.2-92.1%, hypertension range 74.0-76.0%) are not significantly different between 2 provinces (Alberta and British Columbia) (21,24).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sensitivity and specificity of OA case definition are not high; however, these are the standard algorithms accepted for administrative database OA research. Further, previous research in other chronic disease areas have determined the case definition with the highest validity to be 2 physician claims within 2 years, or 1 hospitalization, with a minimum of 3 or more years of data (21)(22)(23)(24). Our estimates include only individuals who have accessed health care services paid for by the provincial health care insurance plan.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation