2022
DOI: 10.3389/fdgth.2022.878369
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validating GAN-BioBERT: A Methodology for Assessing Reporting Trends in Clinical Trials

Abstract: BackgroundThe aim of this study was to validate a three-class sentiment classification model for clinical trial abstracts combining adversarial learning and the BioBERT language processing model as a tool to assess trends in biomedical literature in a clearly reproducible manner. We then assessed the model's performance for this application and compared it to previous models used for this task.MethodsUsing 108 expert-annotated clinical trial abstracts and 2,000 unlabeled abstracts this study develops a three-c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…amount of positive, negative, and neutral abstracts as determined by the clinicians. 4 It is important to note that on an individual article level, GAN-BioBERT only categories abstracts as positive, negative, or neutral. This three-category classification scheme was chosen to provide adequate detail without sacrificing an adequate level of accuracy.…”
Section: Negativementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…amount of positive, negative, and neutral abstracts as determined by the clinicians. 4 It is important to note that on an individual article level, GAN-BioBERT only categories abstracts as positive, negative, or neutral. This three-category classification scheme was chosen to provide adequate detail without sacrificing an adequate level of accuracy.…”
Section: Negativementioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 Furthermore, specific algorithms have been developed that facilitate sentiment analysis of clinical trial abstracts. 4 This presents an intriguing avenue for quick assessment of the qualitative statements made by the authors of a study. However, sentiment analysis as an adjunct or complement to other methods of systemic analysis of biomedical literature has not yet been explored.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the study of Myszewski et al ( 2022 ), the authors showed that the combination of a GAN-BERT setting with a domain-specific PLM BioBERT (Lee et al, 2019 ) outperforms the original GAN-BERT on a sentiment classification task for clinical trial abstracts. However, the authors do not compare the results with those of PLM-only classification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%