2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.comptc.2012.01.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validating empirical force fields for molecular-level simulation of cellulose dissolution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2.6 44 ) was chosen as a proper force field for atomistic simulations of carbohydrate. This force field is one of the first ab-initio based force field that can capture the structural, thermal and mechanical properties of vast range of molecules and atoms including cellulose 45 46 47 48 . In COMPASS, the non-bonded energies include van der Waals and electrostatic energies, with hydrogen bonds being a natural consequence of electrostatic energies.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2.6 44 ) was chosen as a proper force field for atomistic simulations of carbohydrate. This force field is one of the first ab-initio based force field that can capture the structural, thermal and mechanical properties of vast range of molecules and atoms including cellulose 45 46 47 48 . In COMPASS, the non-bonded energies include van der Waals and electrostatic energies, with hydrogen bonds being a natural consequence of electrostatic energies.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Young's Tables 1-4, it can be concluded that the results are close to each other, but they are not the same, since the different force fields analyzer uses different potential energies and atomic behavior. Thus, choosing the appropriate force field for simulation is empirical [43]. By comparing the results of these three force fields for graphene and TiO 2 with the other references in Table 3 it can be concluded that the Dreiding and Universal force fields are more reliable than COMPASS for computing the mechanical properties of the hybrid graphene/titania nanocomposites.…”
Section: Mechanical Properties Of Graphene and Tiomentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Also, in future work we will consider the effects of functionalizing SWCNTs using e.g., oxygen containing groups, and we have seen that the CFF is preferred to the DFF and UFF when studying structures containing these groups. 31 Hence, the CFF was chosen to study larger systems, and we present some preliminary results for the sake of completeness. Fig.…”
Section: Molecular Dynamics Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%