2018
DOI: 10.1667/rr14958.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validating Baboon Ex Vivo and In Vivo Radiation-Related Gene Expression with Corresponding Human Data

Abstract: The research for high-throughput diagnostic tests for victims of radio/nuclear incidents remains ongoing. In this context, we have previously identified candidate genes that predict risk of late-occurring hematologic acute radiation syndrome (HARS) in a baboon model. The goal of the current study was to validate these genes after radiation exposure in humans. We also examined ex vivo relative to in vivo measurements in both species and describe dose-response relationships. Eighteen baboons were irradiated in v… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
29
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since we used TaqMan chemistry with human primer and probe sequences (high sensitivity and specificity), it is more likely that we lost some of the detectable human RNA species due to a mismatch with the baboon genome, rather than producing false positives. Also, in validation studies using human samples from irradiated patients, we were able to reproduce candidate genes from our previous baboon studies implying that differences in genomic sequences represent a minor problem 29 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Since we used TaqMan chemistry with human primer and probe sequences (high sensitivity and specificity), it is more likely that we lost some of the detectable human RNA species due to a mismatch with the baboon genome, rather than producing false positives. Also, in validation studies using human samples from irradiated patients, we were able to reproduce candidate genes from our previous baboon studies implying that differences in genomic sequences represent a minor problem 29 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…In the present work, four different TaqMan Gene Expression Assays (CDKN1A, Hs00355782_m1; FDXR, Hs01031617_m1; DDB2, Hs00772068_m1; and GAPDH, Hs00902257_m1) were utilized and pooled to enable the multiplex amplification of specific cDNA targets. Candidate genes were selected based on two criteria: (1) Genes that were known to be expressed in sufficient quantities for gene expression analysis in whole blood and/or (2) genes that were described to be radiation sensitive in previous studies 23,30 . To ensure linearity of the pre-amplification step, the thermal cycling was set to 10 and 14 cycles for each sample in order to show linearity and, thus, an unbiased pre-amplification.…”
Section: Pre-amplification and Its Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our group has extensive experience in the isolation of RNA from whole blood, its cellular subgroups and biopsies of different tissue sources [20][21][22][23][24] . We recently became interested in isolating RNA from saliva.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In humans, FDXR expression is upregulated in a dose-dependent manner after irradiation, both ex vivo and in vivo , indicating that FDXR is a good biomarker for radiation exposure and for estimating in vivo dose (4648). Moreover, FDXR belongs to a genetic signature for the early prediction of hematological acute radiation syndrome (47, 49). Unlike those authors who have found no association between FDXR expression and the hematological acute radiation syndrome in subjects undergoing RT, our work associates FDXR expression level with dermatitis radiation at the completion of RT treatment (G2 vs. G3 grades, adjusted p = 0.096) (Table 3).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%