2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhm.2010.11.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validating a DEA-based menu analysis model using structural equation modeling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Namely, a thorough review of the studies presented in Table 1 reveals that the vast majority of authors did not provide any necessary evidence of statistical correlation (Coelli, 1995;Wei, 2001) between inputs and outputs before performing DEA. The only exceptions were the studies of Reynolds and Biel (2007), Reynolds and Taylor (2011), Roh and Choi (2010), and Taylor et al (2009).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Namely, a thorough review of the studies presented in Table 1 reveals that the vast majority of authors did not provide any necessary evidence of statistical correlation (Coelli, 1995;Wei, 2001) between inputs and outputs before performing DEA. The only exceptions were the studies of Reynolds and Biel (2007), Reynolds and Taylor (2011), Roh and Choi (2010), and Taylor et al (2009).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It comprised over 25 items and was grouped into two major areas: general information about respondent (manager) and restaurant facility. General informa-tion items (primary data) derived from previous studies (Fang & Hsu, 2014;Kukanja & Planinc, 2013;Reynolds & Taylor, 2011) and were used for classification purposes in the ca analysis (see Table 2). In the next step, financial variables (secondary data) for restaurants efficiency assessment (dea) were identified.…”
Section: Research Methodology Instrument Development and Variable Idementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding inputs, financial measures that have proven to be significant include labour costs, cost of goods sold, controllable fixed expenses, and uncontrollable expenses. Physical inputs that have proven to be important include service capacity (square footage or number of seats) and environmental characteristics (e.g., competitive conditions) (Reynolds & Taylor, 2011). According to Lynn (2001), the validity and usefulness of such a generalised approach to variable selection is somewhat problematic, as, due to lack of available and reliable information, researchers often base their studies on several assumptions.…”
Section: Research Methodology Instrument Development and Variable Idementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It comprised over 25 items and was grouped into two major areas: general information about respondent (manager) and restaurant facility. General informa-tion items (primary data) derived from previous studies (Fang & Hsu, 2014;Kukanja & Planinc, 2013;Reynolds & Taylor, 2011) and were used for classification purposes in the ca analysis (see Table 2). In the next step, financial variables (secondary data) for restaurants efficiency assessment (dea) were identified.…”
Section: Research Methodology Instrument Development and Variable Idementioning
confidence: 99%