Validating a Competency-Based HIT Curriculum in a BHA and MHA Program Through the Voice of the Customer

Kruse, Clemens Scott; Lieneck, Cristian

doi:10.1177/2158244019861458

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Much of the timing and order of steps in this process revolve around a semester course in the Master of Health Administration program at Texas State University [32]. I integrate my process into the course that aligns with my primary area of research, The Management of Health Information Systems.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Writing a Systematic Review for Publication in a Health-Related Degree Program

Kruse¹

2019

JMIR Res Protoc

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundThe protocol in this manuscript was designed to help graduate students publish. It is the result of a challenge from our provost in 2013. I developed this protocol over the last 6 years and have exercised the protocol for the last 5 years. The current version of the protocol has remained mostly static for the last 2 years—only small changes have been made to the process.ObjectiveThe objective of this protocol is to enable students to learn a valuable skill of conducting a systematic review and to write the review in a way that can be published. I have designed the protocol to fit into the schedule of a traditional semester, but also used it in compressed semesters.MethodsAn image map was created in HTML 5.0 and imported into a learning management system. It augments traditional instruction by providing references to published articles, examples, and previously recorded instructional videos. Students use the image map outside the classroom after traditional instruction. The image map helps students create manuscripts that follow established practice and are reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA), and whose authorship follows guidelines by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.ResultsSince its inception, this protocol has helped 77 students publish 27 systematic reviews in nine journals worldwide. Some manuscripts take multiple years to progress through multiple review processes at multiple journals submitted in sequence. Two other professors in the School of Health Administration have used this protocol in their classes.ConclusionsSo far, this method has helped 51% of graduate students who used it in my graduate courses publish articles (with more manuscripts under consideration whose numbers have remained uncounted in this sum). I wish success to others who might use this protocol.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Writing a Systematic Review for Publication in a Health-Related Degree Program

Kruse¹

2019

JMIR Res Protoc

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Writing a Systematic Review for Publication in a Health-Related Degree Program (Preprint)

Kruse¹

2019

Preprint

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BACKGROUND The protocol in this manuscript was designed to help graduate students publish. It is the result of a challenge from our provost in 2013. I developed this protocol over the last 6 years and have exercised the protocol for the last 5 years. The current version of the protocol has remained mostly static for the last 2 years—only small changes have been made to the process. OBJECTIVE The objective of this protocol is to enable students to learn a valuable skill of conducting a systematic review and to write the review in a way that can be published. I have designed the protocol to fit into the schedule of a traditional semester, but also used it in compressed semesters. METHODS An image map was created in HTML 5.0 and imported into a learning management system. It augments traditional instruction by providing references to published articles, examples, and previously recorded instructional videos. Students use the image map outside the classroom after traditional instruction. The image map helps students create manuscripts that follow established practice and are reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA), and whose authorship follows guidelines by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. RESULTS Since its inception, this protocol has helped 77 students publish 27 systematic reviews in nine journals worldwide. Some manuscripts take multiple years to progress through multiple review processes at multiple journals submitted in sequence. Two other professors in the School of Health Administration have used this protocol in their classes. CONCLUSIONS So far, this method has helped 51% of graduate students who used it in my graduate courses publish articles (with more manuscripts under consideration whose numbers have remained uncounted in this sum). I wish success to others who might use this protocol.

show abstract

Validating a Competency-Based HIT Curriculum in a BHA and MHA Program Through the Voice of the Customer

Cited by 2 publications

References 11 publications

Writing a Systematic Review for Publication in a Health-Related Degree Program

Writing a Systematic Review for Publication in a Health-Related Degree Program

Writing a Systematic Review for Publication in a Health-Related Degree Program (Preprint)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About