2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.arabjc.2016.07.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validated electroanalytical determination of flavoxate hydrochloride and tolterodine tartrate drugs in bulk, dosage forms and urine using modified carbon paste electrodes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several analytical methods have been developed for the determination of flavoxate such as the most recent HPLC [27,28], spectrophotometric [27,29] and fluorimetric methods [30]. Electrochemical methods [31][32][33][34][35] have been also developed for the determination of flavoxate. None of the published electrochemical methods [31][32][33][34][35] utilized screen printed electrodes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several analytical methods have been developed for the determination of flavoxate such as the most recent HPLC [27,28], spectrophotometric [27,29] and fluorimetric methods [30]. Electrochemical methods [31][32][33][34][35] have been also developed for the determination of flavoxate. None of the published electrochemical methods [31][32][33][34][35] utilized screen printed electrodes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Electrochemical methods [31][32][33][34][35] have been also developed for the determination of flavoxate. None of the published electrochemical methods [31][32][33][34][35] utilized screen printed electrodes. They didn't study the electrodes' stability via the signal drift and water layer tests.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A literature review revealed that many analytical methods such as direct [11,12,13] and derivative [14] ultraviolet-visible (UV-Vis) spectrophotometric, spectrofluorometric [15,16], high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) [17,18,19,20,21], ultra-performance liquid chromatography (UPLC) [22], liquid chromatography (LC)-mass spectrometry (MS) [23,24], and capillary zone electrophoresis [25,26] methods for the determination of MOX alone and in combination with other drugs in different formulations and in different biological samples. Bibliography data showed that UV-Vis spectrophotometric [27], HPLC [28,29,30,31,32,33,34], electroanalytical [35], and capillary electrophoresis methods [36] were reported for the determination of FLX alone or in combination with other drugs. Only one reversed-phase (RP)-HPLC method has been reported for the concurrent estimation of MOX and FLX in formulation [37].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%