2021
DOI: 10.1111/jocd.14661
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validated 5‐point photonumeric scales for the assessment of the jowls and chin

Abstract: This is an open access article under the terms of the Creat ive Commo ns Attri bution-NonCo mmercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although scales classically originate from the clinical study setting, have been the only tool to measure efficacy in aesthetic medicine for a long time, and are still considered the gold standard, the use of scales has also gained popularity in the clinical setting. [13][14][15] By showing a patient his initial forehead line severity upon rest (static) and eye-brow elevation (dynamic) a physician can properly discuss the possibilities and the anticipated outcome of a treatment with the patient, which facilitates communication overall. At the same time, it is a useful tool to manage expectations with the patient, as very severe static forehead lines will not become mild static forehead lines with the use of botulinum toxin within a time frame of a couple of weeks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although scales classically originate from the clinical study setting, have been the only tool to measure efficacy in aesthetic medicine for a long time, and are still considered the gold standard, the use of scales has also gained popularity in the clinical setting. [13][14][15] By showing a patient his initial forehead line severity upon rest (static) and eye-brow elevation (dynamic) a physician can properly discuss the possibilities and the anticipated outcome of a treatment with the patient, which facilitates communication overall. At the same time, it is a useful tool to manage expectations with the patient, as very severe static forehead lines will not become mild static forehead lines with the use of botulinum toxin within a time frame of a couple of weeks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The creation and validation of the Croma Static Forehead Lines-Assessment Scale and the Croma Dynamic Forehead Lines-Assessment Scale were performed according to a previously published protocol. [13][14][15]…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inclusion criteria for nasolabial fold severity ranged from mild to extreme, following Kopera et al, 10 and for jawline sagging, it ranged from mild to very severe, as per Pooth et al 11 The treatment direction primarily targeted the superior and lateral areas of the face, especially for the nasolabial fold and jowl fat approaching from the skin surface. Each participant underwent up to three treatments at 3‐week intervals.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cascading impact of this approach on adjacent areas can be substantiated through clinical examples. For example, filler injections in the zygomatic area influence the nasolabial folds, injections in the nasolabial folds impact the upper lip, and injections in the front cheek area alter the appearance of the lower lip 34–37 . Similarly, filler placement in the prejowl and lateral cheek areas respectively affect the chin tip and jawline, demonstrating interconnected lifting effects (Figure 10).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%