2022
DOI: 10.5672/apunts.2014-0983.es.(2022/3).149.04
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validación y fiabilidad del sensor Wheeler Jump para la ejecución del salto con contramovimiento

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The moderate consistency found for the midfoot contrasted with the high levels of consistency observed for the forefoot, which are comparable to those reported in other studies. Near-perfect ICCs were found for Optojump (ICC = 0.98; CV = 2.2%) and SEM = 2.43 cm [15], Wheeler jump (CV = 1.5%) and SEM = 1.33 cm [19], Fitjump (ICC = 0.97; CV = 2.3%) and SEM = 1.30 cm [17], and ADR jumping itself (ICC = 0.89, SEM = 0.7 cm) [18]. However, consistency was examined in these studies from sessions separated by 7 days (intersession reliability), which may explain the lower ICC reported in [18], as variability may increase due to biological or environmental factors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The moderate consistency found for the midfoot contrasted with the high levels of consistency observed for the forefoot, which are comparable to those reported in other studies. Near-perfect ICCs were found for Optojump (ICC = 0.98; CV = 2.2%) and SEM = 2.43 cm [15], Wheeler jump (CV = 1.5%) and SEM = 1.33 cm [19], Fitjump (ICC = 0.97; CV = 2.3%) and SEM = 1.30 cm [17], and ADR jumping itself (ICC = 0.89, SEM = 0.7 cm) [18]. However, consistency was examined in these studies from sessions separated by 7 days (intersession reliability), which may explain the lower ICC reported in [18], as variability may increase due to biological or environmental factors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…In photocells, these moments are determined when the beam is no longer interrupted by the foot. Therefore, positioning the cut-off zone in the forefoot implies that it is cut off when ankle extension is complete, thus the data obtained can be considered interchangeable with data from jump mats [18,19] or force platforms [44]. On the other hand, if the device is positioned so that the beam is placed at the midfoot, the flight time will increase because the emitted beam picks up the signal of the first cut by default.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A credible, trustworthy, and practical tool for determining leap height is ADR-Jumping [14]. Also, the Wheeler Jump Sensor is a trustworthy tool that gives researchers and experts accurate data regarding fluctuations in players' athletic abilities [15]. In handball, jumping is influenced by strength.…”
Section: Important Items To Be Analyzed In Handball Athletesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…La medición de la FE se realizó con el sensor fotoeléctrico Wheeler Jump de marca Wheeler Tecnologia (Colombia), el cual es un sistema inalámbrico, portátil y ligero que permite evaluar el salto vertical estimando la altura durante el tiempo de vuelo (Patiño-Palma et al, 2022). Para la medición se realizaron dos saltos, se ejecutó el SJ para determinar la altura y potencia del salto vertical, durante la ejecución se le indicó a los participantes que apoyaran las manos en las caderas, los pies separados de manera que pudieran adoptar una posición de rodillas flexiona-das (aproximadamente 90 grados) durante 5 segundos y luego realizara un salto vertical de esfuerzo máximo.…”
Section: Procedimientos E Instrumentosunclassified