2013
DOI: 10.1590/s1413-41522013000400001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validação de método de cromatografia líquida para a determinação de sete ácidos graxos voláteis intermediários da digestão anaeróbia

Abstract: Ácidos graxos voláteis (AGV) são importantes compostos intermediários indicadores da digestão anaeróbia. Este artigo apresenta dados de validação de uma metodologia para análise de uma mistura de sete AGV (C1 a C5) em amostras ambientais por cromatografia líquida de alta eficiência (CLAE). Foi utilizada uma coluna de exclusão iônica a 55ºC, volume de injeção de 10 µL e fase móvel (0,01 mol.L-1 H2SO4) a 0,6 mL.min-1. Os critérios de validação foram: limites de detecção e de quantificação, que ficaram na faixa d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For this, 10 μL of the centrifuged samples was injected in the Shimadzu HPLC and the separated VFA detected at 210 nm with a diode array detector (DAD). The VFA method was properly validated as detailed elsewhere (Mesquita et al, 2013 …”
Section: Analytical Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this, 10 μL of the centrifuged samples was injected in the Shimadzu HPLC and the separated VFA detected at 210 nm with a diode array detector (DAD). The VFA method was properly validated as detailed elsewhere (Mesquita et al, 2013 …”
Section: Analytical Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To study the recovery of the method, standard EG solutions with known concentrations (theoretical value) at 0.24, 0.48, 0.72, 0.95, 1.20 and 1.43 mmol L -1 were used. The results presented in Table S6 show that the method has a good recovery (acceptance criteria 70-120%) 74 in the concentration range studied, ranging from 97 to 109%.…”
Section: Precision and Recoverymentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The precision of the method was evaluated based on the study of repeatability and intermediate accuracy. Repeatability was verified for the analytical curve by analyzing for 3 concentration levels the relative standard deviation (RSD%), calculated according to equation below [38,39].…”
Section: Precisionmentioning
confidence: 99%