2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2021.07.051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Valid inequalities and branch-and-cut algorithm for the pickup and delivery traveling salesman problem with multiple stacks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They proved new optimal solutions for several benchmark instances, and optimal solutions previously known in the literature are solved more efficiently. Finally, Pereira et al (2022) proposes a procedure of valid inequalities and exact algorithms to solve the PDTSPMS. They also propose a new ILP formulation and new valid inequalities as the foundation for a B&C algorithm.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They proved new optimal solutions for several benchmark instances, and optimal solutions previously known in the literature are solved more efficiently. Finally, Pereira et al (2022) proposes a procedure of valid inequalities and exact algorithms to solve the PDTSPMS. They also propose a new ILP formulation and new valid inequalities as the foundation for a B&C algorithm.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, Pereira et al. (2022) proposes a procedure of valid inequalities and exact algorithms to solve the PDTSPMS. They also propose a new ILP formulation and new valid inequalities as the foundation for a B&C algorithm.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The total length of the route is 7542, the calculation time was 1.45 s and the circuitous route passes through positions 1, 49, 32, 45, 19, 41, 8, 9, 10, 43, 33, 51, 11, 52, 14, 13, 47, 26, 27, 28, 12, 25, 4, 6, 15, 5, 24, 48, 38, 37, 40, 39, 36, 35, 34, 44, 46, 16, 29, 50, 20, 23, 30, 2, 7, 42, 21, 17, 3, 18, 31, 22, 1. The optimal route can be seen in Figure 4. Finally, GAMS for the kroA100.tsp benchmark stopped the computation at 1000.02 s by exceeding the time limit, but the intermediate result of the path length 21282 and its traversal through positions 1,47,93,28,67,58,61,51,87,25,81,69,64,40,54,2,44,50,73,68,85,82,95,13,76,33,37,5,52,78,96,39,30,48,100,41,71,14,3,43,46,29,34,83,…”
Section: Tsp Implementation In Gamsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there are also approaches based on deterministic methods such as cutting plane [35], branch and bound [36] and branch and cut [37,38].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%