“…Electrocardiographic (ECG) metrics are considered to be among the most promising candidate biomarkers (Clancy et al, 2014;Gurel et al, 2020), for two reasons: Firstly, ECG is inexpensive, and quickly and safely applicable in virtually all patient subpopulations, unlike, for example, magnetic resonance imaging-based biomarkers (Mithani et al, 2019;Yakunina et al, 2017). Secondly, there is a clear physiological rationale for a relationship between taVNS and cardiac readouts, since the vagus nerve is involved in the autonomic regulation of heart rate (HR), heart rate variability (HRV) and blood pressure (BP) (Capilupi et al, 2019;Karemaker, 2015). Accordingly, animal studies have confirmed cardiac effects of (invasive) VNS (Brack et al, 2004;Brown and Eccles, 1934;Buschman et al, 2006;Iwao et al, 2000;Kuo et al, 2005;Levy et al, 1969).…”