Vaginal posterior isthmic sling: A report of 53 cases

Capmas, P.; S, Tixier; Neveu, M.-E.; Fernandez, H.

doi:10.1016/j.jogoh.2020.101778

Cited by 1 publication

(2 citation statements)

References 43 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Last but not least, the results in 53 patients at 30 months of bilateral sacrospinofixation using either another manufacturer's mesh or a posterior mesh cut by the surgeon himself were reported by Capmas et al [22]: four women (7.5%) had a prolapse recurrence. Women's satisfaction level was high (8/10 on a visual analog scale).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 87%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Long-Term Results after Bilateral Sacrospinous Colposuspension: A Prospective Study

Chêne

Cerruto

Moret

et al. 2023

JCM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The loss of apical support is usually present in patients with pelvic organ prolapse. An effective correction for the vaginal apex may be an essential part of a durable repair for these women. Apical suspension of the sacrospinous ligament is likely one of the best treatments by the vaginal route. We proposed the evaluation of the functional and anatomical long-term results of an ultralight and macroporous sling. In this prospective study, bilateral sacrospinous colposuspension was performed in 32 patients with a specific mesh. Functional assessment with several validated quality of life questionnaires and pelvic examination was performed at 1, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery. Pelvic examination using the POP-Q classification showed a very good efficacy of the BSC mesh with only three prolapse recurrences at 24 months after surgery. All the following QoL scores were significantly improved by two years: PFIQ-7 (p < 0.0001), PFDI-20 (p < 0.0001), and SF-12 (p < 0.0001). No improvement was achieved by the PISQ12 questionnaire. This vaginal minimally invasive procedure is effective, quick, reproducible, and easy. It may be a relevant option for a vaginal vault or cervical or uterine prolapse.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 87%

“…with the posterior mesh cut by the surgeon himself were not reported in the study by Capmas et al) [22].…”

Section: Of 10mentioning

confidence: 90%