2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2015.11.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vaginal dose assessment in image-guided brachytherapy for cervical cancer: Can we really rely on dose-point evaluation?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…D ICRU has been successfully used in 2D-based brachytherapy reporting and prescribing for long and specific constraints using such dose points have been widely used [20][21][22][23]. In a multivariate analysis within the EMBRACE cohort, the rectal D ICRU has been shown to be an independent predictor of vaginal stenosis, an area where quantitative dose-effect associations have been lacking so far [24]. These findings contributed to re-define the ICRU rectal point (ICRU 38) as ICRU recto-vaginal point (ICRU 89) [17,25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…D ICRU has been successfully used in 2D-based brachytherapy reporting and prescribing for long and specific constraints using such dose points have been widely used [20][21][22][23]. In a multivariate analysis within the EMBRACE cohort, the rectal D ICRU has been shown to be an independent predictor of vaginal stenosis, an area where quantitative dose-effect associations have been lacking so far [24]. These findings contributed to re-define the ICRU rectal point (ICRU 38) as ICRU recto-vaginal point (ICRU 89) [17,25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Outcomes and morbidity were assessed at 3,6,9,12,18,24,30,36,48, and 60 months after treatment completion. Morbidity was evaluated using the Common Toxicity Criteria for adverse events (CTC-AE), version 3.0.…”
Section: Morbiditymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The EMBRACE study did not find any relationship between vaginal toxicity and EQD2 dose at 2 cm 3 of vagina. Other studies by this group and others are currently ongoing to analyze and reduce vaginal toxicity in patients with cervical cancer [ 4 , 6 , 7 , 8 ].…”
Section: Purposementioning
confidence: 99%
“…α/β of HR-CTV was 10 Gy, while for OARs, 3 Gy was applied. The following dose-volume parameters were used for quantitative evaluation of plans [ 35 ]: V 150 : relative volume of IR-CTV, HR-CTV, and GTV receiving at least 150% of the prescribed dose (%), D 90 , D 98 : minimum dose delivered to 90% and 98% of IR-CTV, HR-CTV, and GTV (Gy), D A : dose to point A (Gy), DNR: dose non-uniformity ratio [ 36 ], COIN: conformal index [ 37 ], D 2 : minimal dose of the most exposed 2 cm 3 of a critical organ, including the bladder, rectum, sigmoid, bowel, and vaginal wall (Gy), D ICRU : dose to ICRU reference point of the bladder and rectum (recto-vaginal point) (Gy) [ 38 ], D PIBS : dose to the point of posterior-inferior border of the symphysis (Gy), D PIBS+2 : dose to the point 2 cm above posterior-inferior border of the symphysis parallel to applicator axis (Gy), D PIBS-2 : dose to the point 2 cm below posterior-inferior border of the symphysis parallel to applicator axis (Gy). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%