Abstract:In this paper, considering the linearized Einstein equation with a two-parameter family of linear covariant gauges in de Sitter spacetime, we examine possible vacuum states for the gravitons field with respect to invariance under the de Sitter group SO0(1, 4). Our calculations explicitly reveal that there exists no natural de Sitter-invariant vacuum state (the Euclidean state) for the gravitons field. Indeed, on the foundation of a rigorous group theoretical reasoning, we prove that if one insists on full cova… Show more
“…Several recent works discussed whether the Hamiltonian describing such a system should contain A 2 terms, and as such, whether it is subject to the no-go theorem. [51][52][53][54][55][56][57] For at least some designs of the circuit, if one starts from the classical Kirchoff equations (i.e., conditions on the currents and voltages) of the circuit, and proceeds to quantize these equations, the resulting Hamiltonian is not necessarily subject to the no-go theorem. That is, there are cases where either the A 2 term is absent, or where it is present, but with a weaker coupling strength than required to prevent the phase transition.…”
Section: Other Realizations Of the Dicke Modelmentioning
The Dicke model describes the coupling between a quantized cavity field and a large ensemble of two‐level atoms. When the number of atoms tends to infinity, this model can undergo a transition to a superradiant phase, belonging to the mean‐field Ising universality class. The superradiant transition was first predicted for atoms in thermal equilibrium and was recently realized with a quantum simulator made of atoms in an optical cavity, subject to both dissipation and driving. This progress report offers an introduction to some theoretical concepts relevant to the Dicke model, reviewing the critical properties of the superradiant phase transition and the distinction between equilibrium and nonequilibrium conditions. In addition, it explains the fundamental difference between the superradiant phase transition and the more common lasing transition. This report mostly focuses on the steady states of atoms in single‐mode optical cavities, but it also mentions some aspects of real‐time dynamics, as well as other quantum simulators, including superconducting qubits, trapped ions, and using spin–orbit coupling for cold atoms. These realizations differ in regard to whether they describe equilibrium or nonequilibrium systems.
“…Several recent works discussed whether the Hamiltonian describing such a system should contain A 2 terms, and as such, whether it is subject to the no-go theorem. [51][52][53][54][55][56][57] For at least some designs of the circuit, if one starts from the classical Kirchoff equations (i.e., conditions on the currents and voltages) of the circuit, and proceeds to quantize these equations, the resulting Hamiltonian is not necessarily subject to the no-go theorem. That is, there are cases where either the A 2 term is absent, or where it is present, but with a weaker coupling strength than required to prevent the phase transition.…”
Section: Other Realizations Of the Dicke Modelmentioning
The Dicke model describes the coupling between a quantized cavity field and a large ensemble of two‐level atoms. When the number of atoms tends to infinity, this model can undergo a transition to a superradiant phase, belonging to the mean‐field Ising universality class. The superradiant transition was first predicted for atoms in thermal equilibrium and was recently realized with a quantum simulator made of atoms in an optical cavity, subject to both dissipation and driving. This progress report offers an introduction to some theoretical concepts relevant to the Dicke model, reviewing the critical properties of the superradiant phase transition and the distinction between equilibrium and nonequilibrium conditions. In addition, it explains the fundamental difference between the superradiant phase transition and the more common lasing transition. This report mostly focuses on the steady states of atoms in single‐mode optical cavities, but it also mentions some aspects of real‐time dynamics, as well as other quantum simulators, including superconducting qubits, trapped ions, and using spin–orbit coupling for cold atoms. These realizations differ in regard to whether they describe equilibrium or nonequilibrium systems.
“…Our aim in the present work, instead, will be to point out a potential relevance between the observable smallness of the cosmological constant and a choice of vacuum in the dS gravitational background of * bamba@sss.fukushima-u.ac.jp † Enayati@iauctb.ac.ir ‡ s.rahbardehghan@iauctb.ac.ir our expanding Universe, now known as the KGB vacuum. This vacuum, based on a new representation of the canonical commutation relations, was recently proposed as an alternative to the dS natural vacuum state (the Bunch-Davies state) that yields a fully covariant and coordinate-independent quantization (the KGB quantization) of linearized gravity in dS space [6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. [Due to the lack of the natural dS-invariant vacuum state for free gravitons, the fact that is now widely accepted in the physics community (see, for instance, [7,13,14]), the usual canonical quantization seems to break down for field theory of dS quantum gravity.]…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This vacuum, based on a new representation of the canonical commutation relations, was recently proposed as an alternative to the dS natural vacuum state (the Bunch-Davies state) that yields a fully covariant and coordinate-independent quantization (the KGB quantization) of linearized gravity in dS space [6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. [Due to the lack of the natural dS-invariant vacuum state for free gravitons, the fact that is now widely accepted in the physics community (see, for instance, [7,13,14]), the usual canonical quantization seems to break down for field theory of dS quantum gravity.] Let us begin by summarizing the general properties of the KGB quantization method, while dS spacetime with the metric (1) covering the whole dS manifold is considered as the classical background.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On one hand, this shows that the KGB quantization respects the whole dS manifold symmetries which are basic for field dynamics in this space. More exactly, the KGB quantum field is causal and has all covariance properties of the classical field in a strong sense, even when the KGB method is applied to situations where the usual quantization method fails, such as the dS linearized gravity [6][7][8][9] and the dS minimally coupled scalar field [11,12]. [The crucial point about both cases is that the associated total space is indeed the smallest, complete and non-degenerate innerproduct space fulfilling all invariance properties of the theory.]…”
We point out a potential relevance between the Krein-Gupta-Bleuler (KGB) vacuum leading to a fully covariant quantum field theory for gravity in de Sitter (dS) spacetime and the observable smallness of the cosmological constant. This may provide a formulation of linear quantum gravity in a framework amenable to developing a more complete theory determining the value of the cosmological constant.
“…All of these developments plead in favour of setting up a model of QFT in dS spacetime with the same level of completeness and rigor as its Minkowskian counterpart. In this regard, we refer in particular to a promising formulation of such a theory and its subsequent thermic interpretation that was originally put forward for the "massive" scalar fields in dS spacetime in the 1990's [7][8][9], and during recent two decades, it has been subject to scrutiny in a number of works to make explicit the extra algebraic structure inherent to other dS elementary systems (see, for instance, [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21]). Technically, this model of dS QFT enjoys a robust group theoretical content.…”
We present a covariant quantization of the "massive" spin-3 2 Rarita-Schwinger field in de Sitter (dS) spacetime. The dS group representation theory and its Wigner interpretation combined with the Wightman-Gärding axiomatic and analyticity requirements in the complexified pseudo-Riemanian manifold constitute the basis of the quantization scheme, while the whole procedure is carried out in terms of coordinate-independent dS plane waves. We make explicit the correspondence between unitary irreducible representations (UIRs) of the dS group and the field theory in dS spacetime: by "massive" is meant a field that carries a particular principal series representation of the dS group. We drive the plane-wave representation of the dS massive Rarita-Schwinger field in a manifestly dS-invariant manner. We show that it exactly reduces to its Minkowskian counterpart when the curvature tends to zero as far as the analyticity domain conveniently chosen. We then present the Wightman two-point function fulfilling the minimal requirements of local anticommutativity, covariance, and normal analyticity. The Hilbert space structure and the unsmeared field operator are also defined. The analyticity properties of the waves and the two-point function that we discuss in this paper allow for a detailed study of the Hilbert space of the theory, and give rise to the thermal physical interpretation.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.