2000
DOI: 10.1023/a:1001947813563
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vacuum Quantum Fluctuations in Curved Space and the Theory of Gravitation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
180
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 207 publications
(183 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
180
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, regularization of field theories in curved space is known to induce in the action a series in the curvature tensor, see [20]. We now see that if this series possesses a finite radius of convergence it induces a bandwidth cutoff and sampling theorem for the metric itself, i.e., a cutoff on the curvature of space-time.…”
mentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Interestingly, regularization of field theories in curved space is known to induce in the action a series in the curvature tensor, see [20]. We now see that if this series possesses a finite radius of convergence it induces a bandwidth cutoff and sampling theorem for the metric itself, i.e., a cutoff on the curvature of space-time.…”
mentioning
confidence: 67%
“…One of the more fascinating approaches to “quantum gravity” is the suggestion, typically attributed to Sakharov [540, 628], that gravity itself may not be “fundamental physics”. Indeed it is now a relatively common opinion, maybe not mainstream but definitely a strong minority opinion, that gravity (and in particular the whole notion of spacetime and spacetime geometry) might be no more “fundamental” than is fluid dynamics.…”
Section: Towards a Theory Of Quantum Gravity?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the more fascinating approaches to “quantum gravity” is the suggestion, typically attributed to Sakharov [332, 393], that gravity itself may not be “fundamental physics”. Indeed it is now a relatively common opinion, maybe not mainstream but definitely a strong minority opinion, that gravity (and in particular the whole notion of spacetime and spacetime geometry) might be no more “fundamental” than is fluid dynamics.…”
Section: Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sakharov had in mind a specific model in which gravity could be viewed as an “elasticity” of the spacetime medium, and was “induced” via one-loop physics in the matter sector [332, 393]. In this way Sakharov had hoped to relate the observed value of Newton’s constant (and the cosmological constant) to the spectrum of particle masses.…”
Section: Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%