2012
DOI: 10.1007/s00238-012-0698-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vacuum closure as a skin-graft dressing: a comparison against conventional dressing

Abstract: Background Grafting condition is one of the important determinants of skin-graft take. The technique of VacuumClosure has been claimed to improve the same and thereby graft take. However, there are few comparative studies against the conventional dressing technique evaluating its effectiveness in skin grafting. The present study was undertaken to compare Vacuum-closure with conventional dressing over freshly laid split-skin grafts. Methods Consecutive patients undergoing split-skin grafting were randomized int… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Four RCTs compared NPWT with traditional methods of graft fixation 58–61 . Llanos et al 60 analyzed 30 burn patients receiving SSGs, comparing NPWT with a control in which the same dressing was applied without connection to negative pressure.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Four RCTs compared NPWT with traditional methods of graft fixation 58–61 . Llanos et al 60 analyzed 30 burn patients receiving SSGs, comparing NPWT with a control in which the same dressing was applied without connection to negative pressure.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Four RCTs compared NPWT with traditional methods of graft fixation. [58][59][60][61] Llanos et al 60 analyzed 30 burn patients receiving SSGs, comparing NPWT with a control in which the same dressing was applied without connection to negative pressure. There was significantly less skin graft loss in the NPWT cohort by the fourth postoperative day (0 cm 2 vs 4.5 cm 22 ), accompanied by a significantly shorter length of hospital stay.…”
Section: Negative Pressure Dressings Versus Other Fixation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The NPWT dressing immobilizes the graft, reducing shear motion and fluid accumulation beneath the graft. Two well-designed and implemented RCTs (total n = 124 grafts) reported a statistically significant improvement in graft take and decreased time to healing 33,34 (Level/Class: A/IIa).…”
Section: Npwt-split-thickness Skin Graftmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, makeshift NPWT devices have been contructed in low-resource settings (environment defined by difficulty covering healthcare costs, limited access to supplies, poor infrastructure, or less-trained personnel 27 ). Studies suggest that homemade NPWT devices demonstrate benefits, such as a reduction in reoperation, graft loss, and hospital length of stay, 5,28,29 and reduce costs compared to commercial products ($25.40/day compared to $110.06/ day), 30 but homemade devices lack evidence supporting safety, reliability, and ease of use.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%