2004
DOI: 10.1099/vir.0.19760-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vaccine potential of a murine gammaherpesvirus-68 mutant deficient for ORF73

Abstract: A murine gammaherpesvirus (MHV-68) containing a deletion of the putative plasmid maintenance protein ORF73 exhibits a severe latency deficit. In this study the ability of an ORF73 deletion mutant (D73) to confer in vivo protection against subsequent challenge with wild-type virus has been examined. Vaccination studies have shown that D73 vaccination reduced latent infection of wild-type challenge virus to a level below the limit of detection. These results indicate that a live-attenuated gammaherpesvirus that … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

2
27
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, the BoHV-4 ORF73-deleted strain could be a good candidate for the development of BoHV-4 as a vector in vaccinology. This hypothesis is further supported by an early study on the vaccine potential of a MHV-68 mutant deficient for ORF73 (Fowler & Efstathiou, 2004). …”
Section: Bohv-4 Orf73 Is Essential For Virus Persistence In Vivosupporting
confidence: 51%
“…Consequently, the BoHV-4 ORF73-deleted strain could be a good candidate for the development of BoHV-4 as a vector in vaccinology. This hypothesis is further supported by an early study on the vaccine potential of a MHV-68 mutant deficient for ORF73 (Fowler & Efstathiou, 2004). …”
Section: Bohv-4 Orf73 Is Essential For Virus Persistence In Vivosupporting
confidence: 51%
“…To circumvent these problems, several labs have explored vaccination strategies involving live attenuated viruses, taking advantage of the availability of mutant viruses that are incapable of establishing latency or that are capable of establishing a latent infection with various defects in reactivation (15)(16)(17)(18). The new finding that viral replication is not absolutely required for the establishment of latency has led to renewed interest in replicationdeficient mutants (12)(13)(14)19).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neither vaccination strategy reduced the level of latent virus in the mice long term. However, protection from the establishment of long-term latency by vaccination is theoretically possible, since infection with MHV-68 mutants which are unable to reactivate from or establish latency prevents residual latency after challenge with wild-type virus (4,21). Little is known concerning the effect of priming T-cell responses that target both lytic and persistent phases of the virus life cycle.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%