2022
DOI: 10.1101/2022.03.22.22272769
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vaccine effectiveness of two and three doses of BNT162b2 and CoronaVac against COVID-19 in Hong Kong

Abstract: Background: Hong Kong maintained extremely low circulation of SARS-CoV-2 until a major community epidemic of Omicron BA.2 starting in January 2022. Both mRNA BNT162b2 (BioNTech/Fosun Pharma) and inactivated CoronaVac (Sinovac) vaccines are widely available, however coverage has remained low in older adults. Vaccine effectiveness in this predominantly infection-naive population is unknown. Methods: We used individual-level case data on mild/moderate, severe/fatal and fatal hospitalized COVID-19 from December 3… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
1
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
28
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…23 For the Omicron period, our estimates are consistent with an ecological study from Hong Kong regarding the effectiveness of a primary vaccination with CoronaVac. 12 However, our estimates of vaccine effectiveness against severe disease for a homologous booster are lower than reported the study in Hong Kong. The differences in study design, previous attack rate in the population, time of follow-up, non-pharmaceutical interventions in place during the Omicron outbreak in Hong Kong, and limited sample size for severe disease in the Hong Kong study could explain these differences.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 66%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…23 For the Omicron period, our estimates are consistent with an ecological study from Hong Kong regarding the effectiveness of a primary vaccination with CoronaVac. 12 However, our estimates of vaccine effectiveness against severe disease for a homologous booster are lower than reported the study in Hong Kong. The differences in study design, previous attack rate in the population, time of follow-up, non-pharmaceutical interventions in place during the Omicron outbreak in Hong Kong, and limited sample size for severe disease in the Hong Kong study could explain these differences.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 66%
“…The differences in study design, previous attack rate in the population, time of follow-up, non-pharmaceutical interventions in place during the Omicron outbreak in Hong Kong, and limited sample size for severe disease in the Hong Kong study could explain these differences. 12 There was evidence for waning of effectiveness against mild disease for homologous and heterologous boosters, and against severe disease for a homologous booster dose after three months during the Omicron period. This finding is consistent with numerous studies of primary series vaccination, [4][5][6] and with more recent studies of booster dose effectiveness over time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The effectiveness of Paxlovid and Molnupiravir indicate that the nsps are ideal targets for developing antiviral drugs, the activity of which are almost unaffected by spike mutations. Besides, the third dose of vaccines, based on the original SARS-CoV-2 Spike, can still significantly improve the immunity against Omicron 41 , 99 , 100 . Meanwhile, the spike-sequence-updated vaccines and pan-coronavirus vaccines are around the corner 101 , 102 , 103 .…”
Section: What’s Next?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 7 Because the results reported by Jara and colleagues 1 do not cover the omicron surge, we cannot estimate the effectiveness of the three-dose schedules in those settings. McMenamin and colleagues 8 analysed the data from Dec 31, 2021, to March 8, 2022, to estimate the vaccine effectiveness of BNT162b2 and CoronaVac vaccines covering the fifth wave of COVID-19 with omicron BA.2 lineage in Hong Kong. Three doses of both vaccines were shown to be highly protective against severe disease and mortality in all age groups, yet the effects of heterologous vaccination have not been investigated.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%