2022
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.4064649
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vaccine Effectiveness of Two and Three Doses of BNT162b2 and Coronavac Against COVID-19 in Hong Kong

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
34
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
34
1
Order By: Relevance
“…23 For the Omicron period, our estimates are consistent with an ecological study from Hong Kong regarding the effectiveness of a primary vaccination with CoronaVac. 12 However, our estimates of vaccine effectiveness against severe disease for a homologous booster are lower than reported the study in Hong Kong. The differences in study design, previous attack rate in the population, time of follow-up, non-pharmaceutical interventions in place during the Omicron outbreak in Hong Kong, and limited sample size for severe disease in the Hong Kong study could explain these differences.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 66%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…23 For the Omicron period, our estimates are consistent with an ecological study from Hong Kong regarding the effectiveness of a primary vaccination with CoronaVac. 12 However, our estimates of vaccine effectiveness against severe disease for a homologous booster are lower than reported the study in Hong Kong. The differences in study design, previous attack rate in the population, time of follow-up, non-pharmaceutical interventions in place during the Omicron outbreak in Hong Kong, and limited sample size for severe disease in the Hong Kong study could explain these differences.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 66%
“…The differences in study design, previous attack rate in the population, time of follow-up, non-pharmaceutical interventions in place during the Omicron outbreak in Hong Kong, and limited sample size for severe disease in the Hong Kong study could explain these differences. 12…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We found that cases in persons who had a complete primary series at age of 65-79 years or ≥80 years would have a much lower fatality risk (Figure 2, Supplementary Table 2). In a separate study, we estimated very high vaccine effectiveness against severe disease in older adults ≥60 years of age who received either three doses of the inactivated vaccine CoronaVac or two doses of BNT162b2 [22]. For adults ≥60 years of age, the World Health Organization recommend that three doses of inactivated vaccine are needed [23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, we were able to conclude that third dose of mRNA vaccination would provide substantial benefits against both ancestral and Omicron strains. Our results on immunogenicity may be subjected to selection bias including volunteer bias, since in Hong Kong older adults are more inclined to receive the inactivated vaccines and younger adults to mRNA vaccines [29]. Our results on reactogenicity may be subjected to information bias as this was an open-label trial and it is recognized that there could be more post-vaccination reactions after mRNA vaccination compared to inactivated vaccination [30].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%