2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2022.09.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vaccine Effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 Variants in Adolescents from 15 to 90 Days after Second Dose: A Population-Based Test-Negative Case-Control Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, as the pandemic evolved, variants of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) emerged and raised concerns about the immunogenicity of vaccines [6]. Case-control studies reported a substantial reduction in vaccine effectiveness (VE) against symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection and severe outcomes (hospitalization or death) in adolescents during the omicron-predominant period [7][8][9][10][11]. Recent studies have demonstrated that BNT162b2, in the omicron-predominant period, provided moderate protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19-related hospitalization in children aged 5-11 years [12,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as the pandemic evolved, variants of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) emerged and raised concerns about the immunogenicity of vaccines [6]. Case-control studies reported a substantial reduction in vaccine effectiveness (VE) against symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection and severe outcomes (hospitalization or death) in adolescents during the omicron-predominant period [7][8][9][10][11]. Recent studies have demonstrated that BNT162b2, in the omicron-predominant period, provided moderate protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19-related hospitalization in children aged 5-11 years [12,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The NOS scores indicated that all the studies included in the analysis demonstrated moderate to high methodological quality. Among them, 17 studies ( 10 , 17–19 , 23–26 , 28 , 29 , 32 , 34 , 35 , 38 , 43 , 45 ) were rated as high quality, while 16 studies ( 11 , 12 , 20–22 , 27 , 30 , 31 , 33 , 36 , 37 , 39–42 , 44 ) were considered to be of medium quality ( Supplementary Table 2 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, 32 records were eligible for inclusion in our study (Supplementary Table 1). Among these, we identified 15 cohort studies (10, 17-30) and 18 case-control studies (11,12,(31)(32)(33)(34)(35)(36)(37)(38)(39)(40)(41)(42)(43)(44)(45), all utilizing non-vaccination as a control group, comprising an expansive cohort of 17,177,822 individuals. Of the 33 studies (one record contains two studies) included, 29 (87.88%) evaluated the effectiveness of the BNT162b2 vaccine, six (18.18%) involved the efficacy of the CoronaVac vaccine, two each on the effectiveness of the mRNA-1273 and the BBIBP-CorV vaccine, and one on the ChAdOx1nCoV-19 vaccine.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…T varies in our study in order to observe varying prediction errors for each value of T of vaccination. According to the literature [ 34 ], this is usually after 90 days but it may vary with the country and type of COVID-19 vaccine received. Therefore, in our study, candidates for T were selected as 30, 60, 90, and 120 days.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%